2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green energy aware and cluster based communication for future load prediction in IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results implied that the BDL-PPDT technique has attained effective outcomes with the lower NDSN under all rounds. For instance, with 800 rounds, the BDL-PPDT technique has achieved minimal NDSN of 1, whereas the DEEC, PHC, HNS, CHSES, and RDAC-BC techniques have obtained maximum NDSN of 116, 106, 64, 42, and 5 nodes, respectively [ 28 31 ]. At the same time, with 3500 rounds, the BDL-PPDT technique has offered a least NDSN of 290, whereas the DEEC, PHC, HNS, CHSES, and RDAC-BC techniques have reached to an increased NDSN of 488, 481, 472, 470, and 362 nodes, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results implied that the BDL-PPDT technique has attained effective outcomes with the lower NDSN under all rounds. For instance, with 800 rounds, the BDL-PPDT technique has achieved minimal NDSN of 1, whereas the DEEC, PHC, HNS, CHSES, and RDAC-BC techniques have obtained maximum NDSN of 116, 106, 64, 42, and 5 nodes, respectively [ 28 31 ]. At the same time, with 3500 rounds, the BDL-PPDT technique has offered a least NDSN of 290, whereas the DEEC, PHC, HNS, CHSES, and RDAC-BC techniques have reached to an increased NDSN of 488, 481, 472, 470, and 362 nodes, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 and Figure 3 report a brief network lifetime (NLT) examination of the IMD-EACBR model compared to other approaches. The results indicate that the IMD-EACBR model accomplished a maximum NLT under all SNs [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. For instance, with 100 SNs, the IMD-EACBR model attained an maximum NLT of 1719 rounds, whereas the sunflower optimisation (SFO), gray wolf optimisation (GWO), genetic algorithm (GA), ant line optimisation (ALO), and particle swarm optimisation (PSO) models obtained reduced NLTs of 1593, 1448, 1415, 1349, and 1300 rounds, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…e idea of QPSO was established depending upon the aforementioned analyses. All the individual particle in QPSO is preserved as a rotation less one moves in important space and the likelihood of particle is appear at the location x t i in search iteration, t is defined after a likelihood density purpose [35]. Employ the Monte Carlo technique, all the particles fly by:…”
Section: Data Classification Using Qpso-frc Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of QPSO was established depending upon the aforementioned analyses. All the individual particle in QPSO is preserved as a rotation less one moves in important space and the likelihood of particle is appear at the location x i t in search iteration, t is defined after a likelihood density purpose [ 35 ]. Employ the Monte Carlo technique, all the particles fly by: Whereas α denotes variable named contraction expansion coefficient; u i , d t ∗ ran dv denotes arbitrary number of uniform distributions between zero and one; mbest denotes global virtual point named mainstream or mean optimal determined by …”
Section: The Proposed Aiccp-tbm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%