2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.205444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green's function approach to edge states in transition metal dichalcogenides

Abstract: The semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides MX 2 show an abundance of onedimensional metallic edges and grain boundaries. Standard techniques for calculating edge states typically model nanoribbons, and require the use of supercells. In this paper, we formulate a Green's function technique for calculating edge states of (semi-)infinite two-dimensional systems with a single well-defined edge or grain boundary. We express Green's functions in terms of Bloch matrices, constructed from the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(205 reference statements)
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of a tight-binding description with respect to first-principles methods is that it provides a simple starting point for the further inclusion of many-body electron-electron interaction, external strains, as well as of the dynamical effects of the electron-lattice interaction. Tight-binding approaches are often more convenient than ab initio methods for investigating systems involving a very large number of atoms [26], disordered and inhomogeneous samples [29], strained and/or bent samples [30,31], materials nanostructured in large scales (nanoribbons [32,33], ripples [34]) or in twisted multilayer materials. The aim of the present paper is twofold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of a tight-binding description with respect to first-principles methods is that it provides a simple starting point for the further inclusion of many-body electron-electron interaction, external strains, as well as of the dynamical effects of the electron-lattice interaction. Tight-binding approaches are often more convenient than ab initio methods for investigating systems involving a very large number of atoms [26], disordered and inhomogeneous samples [29], strained and/or bent samples [30,31], materials nanostructured in large scales (nanoribbons [32,33], ripples [34]) or in twisted multilayer materials. The aim of the present paper is twofold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite TMD samples exhibit highly localized states near the edges of the flake, [60][61][62][63][64] resulting in noncolinear and tunable long range interactions when the impurities sit at these edges, and with slow decay with the impurity separation. 41,42 The plaquette hybridization geometry has not yet been reported on TMDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the pushback effect makes electrons push back into the metal, resulting in the work‐function decrease, which is a general phenomenon in the physisorption of 2D semiconductors on metals 56. In Mo 2 CF 2 ‐pS junctions, the pushback effect is more apparent in ML‐B (Mo 2 CF 2 contacting to pS (00‐1) surface, the relatively high work‐function model in Figure 2b) than ML‐A 57. Second, the built‐in electrical field of pS also makes a contribution to charge transfer/redistribution at the metal‐pS interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[56] In Mo 2 CF 2 -pS junctions, the pushback effect is more apparent in ML-B (Mo 2 CF 2 contacting to pS (00-1) surface, the relatively high work-function model in Figure 2b) than ML-A. [57] Second, the builtin electrical field of pS also makes a contribution to charge transfer/redistribution at the metal-pS interface. In the ML-A system, the built-in dipole promote electron from metal to pS at interface (Figure 3e).…”
Section: Tunable N-to P-type Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%