2018
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2018.15825abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green Strategic Intent and Green Process Innovation Performance:The Role of Intellectual Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy with Subramaniam and Youndt (2005) findings may be attributable to the measure of GI used in this study, which involved the scope of green product and process innovation but not the strength of the innovation (i.e., incremental vs. radical innovation, Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005 ). Our conclusions about the positive impacts of GSC and GRC on GI are consistent with the results of Subramaniam and Youndt (2005) and Jirakraisiri et al (2018) . Thus, our findings reinforce the idea that GI relies on intangible elements such as employee skills and capabilities, process routines, and networking relations between the firm and its business partners related to environmental issues ( Soo et al, 2017 ; Albort-Morant et al, 2018a ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy with Subramaniam and Youndt (2005) findings may be attributable to the measure of GI used in this study, which involved the scope of green product and process innovation but not the strength of the innovation (i.e., incremental vs. radical innovation, Subramaniam and Youndt, 2005 ). Our conclusions about the positive impacts of GSC and GRC on GI are consistent with the results of Subramaniam and Youndt (2005) and Jirakraisiri et al (2018) . Thus, our findings reinforce the idea that GI relies on intangible elements such as employee skills and capabilities, process routines, and networking relations between the firm and its business partners related to environmental issues ( Soo et al, 2017 ; Albort-Morant et al, 2018a ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Green structural capital refers to reserves of organizational capabilities, organizational commitments, knowledge management systems, reward systems, information technology systems, databases, managerial operating processes, managerial philosophies, organizational culture, etcetera, related to a company’s environmental protection behaviors ( Chen, 2008 ). The core idea of GSC is to reposition and rethink existing organizational structure and business processes congruent with environmentally friendly principles in order to cultivate new organizational structures that align with the dynamics of the environment, thus promoting GI ( Jirakraisiri et al, 2018 ). An enterprise’s cultural atmosphere also has a positive effect on corporate innovative behavior ( López-Gamero et al, 2011 ; Barrena-Martínez et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hotels' concern is to employ the GIC, which strongly supports the objectives of top management concerning the preservation and enhancement of the hotel's GPIP. Jirakraisiri et al (2018) claim that GICs support workers' efforts and abilities towards the structure of GPIP. Notably, GKS is established as a mediator between GIC, IWB and GPIP, an essential tool for boosting a company's innovation performance (Zhang and Li, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jirakraisiri et al . (2018) claim that GICs support workers' efforts and abilities towards the structure of GPIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%