2022
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.24132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Thryallis glauca (Cav.) Kuntze and their role as antioxidant and antibacterial

Abstract: The present work has reported a green chemistry-based approach for the synthesis of crystalline metal oxide nanoparticle using plant extract to reduce metal ions. It demonstrated the efficient synthesis of Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) using aqueous leaf extract of Thryallis glauca (Cav.) Kuntze with a focus on minimizing toxic reactants and byproducts. The physicochemical characterizations by standard methods and the mechanism of action were presented. The UV-Vis absorption peak of the annealed ZnO NPs a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ZnO NPs have a perfect crystalline structure situated shown by the thin and strong peaks of diffraction. From Figure 6 (a and b), one can conclude that the diffractions peaks along (101) plane are more dominant and stronger peaks, and the obtained XRD results behaviors are good agreement with previous studies [12,[21][22][23][24][25][26] . While Figure 6 (c) shows a higher and stronger diffraction peak at the plane of (100), which indicated that the most of ZnO NPs were grown at the plane (100) and the obtained results behavior are in good agreement with previous studies [38] .…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ZnO NPs have a perfect crystalline structure situated shown by the thin and strong peaks of diffraction. From Figure 6 (a and b), one can conclude that the diffractions peaks along (101) plane are more dominant and stronger peaks, and the obtained XRD results behaviors are good agreement with previous studies [12,[21][22][23][24][25][26] . While Figure 6 (c) shows a higher and stronger diffraction peak at the plane of (100), which indicated that the most of ZnO NPs were grown at the plane (100) and the obtained results behavior are in good agreement with previous studies [38] .…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They found that the ZnO NPs were grown with wurtzite hexagonal structure less than 50 nm and the antioxidant analysis by DPPH assay illustrated an excellent free radical scavenging activity. The prepared ZnO NPs tested against pathogenic Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis did not show any antibacterial activity [21] . Abdullah M Abdo, et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, applying ZnO-NPs promoted better adaptation toward salinity stress in Kargi and CSR 30 by lowering the Na+ concentration and Na + /K + ratio in their leaves and improving the K + ion concentration. Improving the Na +/ K + balance is a key trait of salinity tolerance for plants to better adapt under salinity stress conditions [85]. Similar results on Zea mays and Gossypium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In living cells, potassium helps maintain the turgidity and regulation of essential enzyme activity of the cell. At the same time, the shortage of K + ions and the high Na + /K + ratio inhibits the growth and development of plants [84][85][86][87]. Therefore, applying ZnO-NPs promoted better adaptation toward salinity stress in Kargi and CSR 30 by lowering the Na+ concentration and Na + /K + ratio in their leaves and improving the K + ion concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DPPH solution without a sample served as the control, while ascorbic acid served as the reference standard. The following relation was used to compute the radical scavenging activity (Dey & Somaiah, 2022): Radical scavenging%=ADPPHAnormalSADPPH×100, where, A DPPH is the DPPH solution absorbance in the absence of the sample, while A S is the absorbance of sample/DPPH mixtures. The sample concentration needed to inhibit 50% of the initial DPPH amount (IC 50 ) was also estimated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%