2016
DOI: 10.3390/cli4010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse Gas Induced Changes in the Seasonal Cycle of the Amazon Basin in Coupled Climate-Vegetation Regional Model

Abstract: Previous work suggests that changes in seasonality could lead to a 70% reduction in the extent of the Amazon rainforest. The primary cause of the dieback of the rainforest is a lengthening of the dry season due to a weakening of the large-scale tropical circulation. Here we examine these changes in the seasonal cycle. Under present day conditions the Amazon climate is characterized by a zonal separation of the dominance of the annual and semi-annual seasonal cycles. This behavior is strongly modified under gre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all experiments, the CO 2 concentration was set to 325 ppm, which is based on boron isotopes in planktonic foraminifera shells for the MIS31 interval (Honisch et al, 2009). The MIS31 and CTR experiments have been described in further detail elsewhere by Justino et al (2017), but a brief discussion of the global climate differences between these two runs is provided below. Table 1 shows the global and hemispheric surface temperature values for the CTR and MIS31 simulations, and ERA-Interim (ERA-I; Dee et al, 2011) and HadCRUT4 for the 1980-2010 interval.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In all experiments, the CO 2 concentration was set to 325 ppm, which is based on boron isotopes in planktonic foraminifera shells for the MIS31 interval (Honisch et al, 2009). The MIS31 and CTR experiments have been described in further detail elsewhere by Justino et al (2017), but a brief discussion of the global climate differences between these two runs is provided below. Table 1 shows the global and hemispheric surface temperature values for the CTR and MIS31 simulations, and ERA-Interim (ERA-I; Dee et al, 2011) and HadCRUT4 for the 1980-2010 interval.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Marine Isotope Stage 31 (MIS31; early Pleistocene 1085-1055 ka) is a key paleoclimate period to simulate and analyze the global environmental response to a significantly modified climate forcing (Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005;Yin and Berger, 2012). This interval was characterized by boreal summer temperatures that were several degrees greater than modern climate (up to 6 • C), with a substantial recession of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) sea ice (Melles et al, 2012;Justino et al, 2017). On long timescales, Earth's climate is primarily controlled by external and internal processes related to the astronomical forcing and the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (IPCC, 2013;Erb et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The response of South American vegetation to climate change may be particularly important, since this continent still contains the largest (but rapidly diminishing) continuous area of tropical rainforest [3]. There are several models that simulate the dynamic relationship between climate and vegetation at a macrogeographic scale [4][5][6][7][8][9]. These could be of great utility for climate modelers since, unlike many climate simulations, they consider the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere as a coupled system with biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes occurring across a range of timescales [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%