2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grey matter or social matters? Causal attributions in the era of biological psychiatry

Abstract: Fig. 1. Correlation between the strength of an individual's amputation desire and the surface area of a circumscribed region in the inferior parietal lobe (depicted in B). C: Boxand-whisker plots show distributions of plausibility ratings for two types of causality arguably implied by this correlation, i.e. neural primacy (dark bars) or behavioural primacy (light bars). A and B reprinted, (with permission), from ref. [6].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of BID, a still largely unknown clinical condition, the data reveal a clear preference for a brain-to-mind directed causality, indicating that participants assumed the phenomenal and behavioral properties to be a consequence, rather than a cause of brain alterations. A similar finding was previously reported by Brugger and colleagues [16]; however, the present investigations highlight that implicit assumptions about a correlation that importantly bias the misattribution to an underlying cause significantly depend on the context. Critically, we draw attention to context-dependent differences in justifying those causal misattributions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of BID, a still largely unknown clinical condition, the data reveal a clear preference for a brain-to-mind directed causality, indicating that participants assumed the phenomenal and behavioral properties to be a consequence, rather than a cause of brain alterations. A similar finding was previously reported by Brugger and colleagues [16]; however, the present investigations highlight that implicit assumptions about a correlation that importantly bias the misattribution to an underlying cause significantly depend on the context. Critically, we draw attention to context-dependent differences in justifying those causal misattributions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We compare these 2 contexts to a correlation between symptoms of xenomelia and structural properties of a circumscribed cortical surface area, loosely inspired by the first publication on neurostructural data in xenomelia [15]. We assumed no additional information justifying unidirectional judgment with respect to this largely unknown disorder but expected higher plausibility ratings from the brain to mind [16].…”
Section: Study Design and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neuroimaging methods used here do not allow any inferences on causality. However, facing the graphical depictions of a relationship between cortical structure and behavior, the vector of causality is reportedly biased in a brain-to-mind direction [28]. This holds for laypeople and academics alike and underlines the necessity of considering nonlinear interactions of biological, psychological, and social factors underlying BID.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within Western studies, culture might have a role in differentiating features between European and American individuals. If "Access to and nature of care will heavily depend on the emerging definitions of such conditions" ( [6], p. 46) then the future of understanding…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within Western studies, culture might have a role in differentiating features between European and American individuals. If “Access to and nature of care will heavily depend on the emerging definitions of such conditions” ([6], p. 46) then the future of understanding xenomelia relies on multidisciplinary studies including biological, social and cultural components. Furthermore, attitudes towards social matters were explored in European individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%