2022
DOI: 10.3390/e24111606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grid-Based Clustering Using Boundary Detection

Abstract: Clustering can be divided into five categories: partitioning, hierarchical, model-based, density-based, and grid-based algorithms. Among them, grid-based clustering is highly efficient in handling spatial data. However, the traditional grid-based clustering algorithms still face many problems: (1) Parameter tuning: density thresholds are difficult to adjust; (2) Data challenge: clusters with overlapping regions and varying densities are not well handled. We propose a new grid-based clustering algorithm named G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some new grid-based clustering methods have been proposed to solve the above problems [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. These methods captured attention with the advantage over other approaches because they process data with grid cells.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some new grid-based clustering methods have been proposed to solve the above problems [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. These methods captured attention with the advantage over other approaches because they process data with grid cells.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, existing grid clustering algorithms work by dealing with nodes and cells. The former mainly includes FDGB [ 21 ] and GCBD [ 22 ], while the latter mainly includes GBCN [ 23 ], GCDPP [ 24 ], NGCGAL [ 25 ], and CMSPGD [ 26 ]. However, different grid-based clustering methods have their own considerations in grid space, node or cell processing, and cluster generation strategies, resulting in differences in clustering performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These maps also circumvent the limitations of maps based on aggregate data, which miss local interactions among geo-referenced variables ( 18 ). In contrast, grid-based maps can display a high level of granularity ( 19 ). Furthermore, bio-geographical methods do not assume space homogeneity –an assumption associated with classic spatial statistics, which considers that neighbors are epidemiologically similar ( 20 , 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic CHAMELEON [39] and CURE [40] are agglomerative and divisive hierarchical clustering algorithms respectively. Grid-based clustering algorithms enjoy extremely high attention due to their low complexity in computation and high efficiency in processing spatial datasets [41,42]. STING [43], one of the most classic grid-based clustering algorithms, generates statistical information of several individual grid units by dividing the original spatial data instead of scanning all individual points to reduce the time complexity further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%