2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grid-pattern optimization framework of novel hierarchical stiffened shells allowing for imperfection sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section the WMPLA is applied to the conical shell. For this purpose, a Radial Basis Function (RBF) surrogate-based optimization is performed on the coordinates of multiple perturbation loads [55], [56] in order to implement the WMPLA for a cylindrical shell under pure bending. Through numerical trials, the number of multiple perturbation loads is selected as three, which is a compromise between the optimization convergence and efficiency, the perturbation load is set to 20 N (which can guarantee the convergence of imperfection sensitivity).…”
Section: Worst Multiple Perturbation Load Approach (Wmpla)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section the WMPLA is applied to the conical shell. For this purpose, a Radial Basis Function (RBF) surrogate-based optimization is performed on the coordinates of multiple perturbation loads [55], [56] in order to implement the WMPLA for a cylindrical shell under pure bending. Through numerical trials, the number of multiple perturbation loads is selected as three, which is a compromise between the optimization convergence and efficiency, the perturbation load is set to 20 N (which can guarantee the convergence of imperfection sensitivity).…”
Section: Worst Multiple Perturbation Load Approach (Wmpla)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum KDF for the buckling moment of a cylindrical shells equals to 0.41 which is also the proposed Design KDF of the NASA SP-8019 for all cone geometries. The results for cylinders under pure bending (56) from [1] are shown for the purpose of comparison in Fig. 2 (right).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an efficient optimization process of the material distribution is required to obtain the desired structural response, usually defined in terms of deflections and load-carrying capacity. Many manufacturing options are also available to fine-tune the stiffness and the onset of buckling: grid stiffeners [ 1 ], multi-layered and variable thickness composites [ 2 ], variable angle tows (VATs) [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the dragonfly wing is one typical hierarchical structure with high specific stiffness, including brawny major veins to bear axial load and close-knit minor veins to resist local deformation. 20 Inspired by this, Wang et al 21 developed novel hierarchical stiffened shells with diverse stiffener sizes and patterns, which improved the ability of stiffened shells against buckling and imperfections. Generally, the hierarchical stiffened shell is composed of the skin, major stiffeners (with larger sizes), and minor stiffeners (with smaller sizes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The typical buckling modes for hierarchical stiffened shells are the global buckling mode, the partial global buckling mode (happens between the adjacent major stiffeners), skin local buckling mode, stiffener local buckling mode, and plastic buckling mode. 25 In order to investigate the outstanding load-carrying capacity of hierarchical stiffened panels, numerical and experimental studies have been carried out by Quinn et al, [30][31][32] and corresponding design guidelines of hierarchical stiffened panels were also given by Houston et al 33 Wang et al 21 developed a novel hierarchical stiffened shell reinforced by orthogrid major stiffeners and triangle minor stiffeners and Zhao et al 24 developed a novel one reinforced by triangle major and minor stiffeners, which both improved the bucking loads of stiffened shells significantly. Under the same weight, the hierarchical stiffened shell was verified to have low imperfection sensitivity in comparison to the traditional stiffened shell by Wang et al 22 and Sim et al 34,35 Additionally, the thermal buckling capacity of hierarchical stiffened structures was discussed by Wang et al 36 Although the hierarchical stiffened shell achieves higher load-carrying capacity than the traditional stiffened shell, its optimization problem is more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%