1985
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/217.2.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grids for the determination of effective temperature and surface gravity of B, A and F stars using uvby β photometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
302
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
302
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen: (1) de Jager & Nieuwenhuijzen (1987) because it was used by Cranmer (2005) to discuss the distribution of rotational velocities of Be stars; (2) the calibration of the ubvy−Strömgren photometric indices given by Moon & Dworetsky (1985) and revisited by Napiwotzki et al (1993); and (3) the effective temperatures derived from fitted visible spectral energy distributions by Adelman et al (2002), Fitzpatrick & Massa (2005), and Nieva (2013). In …”
Section: Appendix A: Fundamental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen: (1) de Jager & Nieuwenhuijzen (1987) because it was used by Cranmer (2005) to discuss the distribution of rotational velocities of Be stars; (2) the calibration of the ubvy−Strömgren photometric indices given by Moon & Dworetsky (1985) and revisited by Napiwotzki et al (1993); and (3) the effective temperatures derived from fitted visible spectral energy distributions by Adelman et al (2002), Fitzpatrick & Massa (2005), and Nieva (2013). In …”
Section: Appendix A: Fundamental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stars for which Strömgren uvbyβ photometry is available, we have computed an effective temperature using the FORTRAN code "UVBYBETANEW" of Napiwotzki, Schönberner & Wenske (1993), which is in turn based mainly on the calibrations of Moon & Dworetsky (1985). When the star has colours near the boundary of different calibrations (for example near A0), we have computed the temperature using both calibrations.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these apparent differences in the evolutionary state between magnetic stars in different mass domains, we decided to group our sample in two sub-samples with one containing lower mass stars with M < 3 M (57 stars in all) and another one with M > 3 M (33 stars). The effective temperatures of the stars of both sub-samples have been determined from photometric data in the Geneva system through the calibration of Künzli et al (1997) corrected according to the prescription of North (1998), or, when no Geneva photometry was available, in the Strömgren system, applying the calibration of Moon & Dworetsky (1985), revised by Napiwotzki et al (1993). The luminosities have been obtained by taking into account the bolometric corrections measured by Lanz (1984).…”
Section: Basic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%