Gross and delta efficiencies during uphill running and cycling among elite triathletes

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the gross efficiency (GE) and delta efficiency (DE) during cycling and running in elite triathletes. Methods Five male and five female elite triathletes completed two incremental treadmill tests with an inclination of 2.5° to determine their GE and DE during cycling and running. The speed increments between the 5-min stages were 2.4 and 0.6 km h −1 during the cycling and running tests, respectively. For each test, GE was calculated as the ratio between the mechanical work rate (MWR) and the metabolic rate (MR) at an intensity corresponding to a net increase in blood-lactate concentration of 1 mmol l −1. DE was calculated by dividing the delta increase in MWR by the delta increase in MR for each test. Pearson correlations and paired-sample t tests were used to investigate the relationships and differences, respectively. Results There was a correlation between GE cycle and GE run (r = 0.66; P = 0.038; R 2 = 0.44), but the correlation between DE cycle and DE run was not statistically significant (r = − 0.045; P = 0.90; R 2 = 0.0020). There were differences between GE cycle and GE run (t = 80.8; P < 0.001) as well as between DE cycle and DE run (t = 27.8; P < 0.001). Conclusions Elite triathletes with high GE during running also have high GE during cycling, when exercising at a treadmill inclination of 2.5°. For a moderate uphill incline, elite triathletes are more energy efficient during cycling than during running, independent of work rate. Keywords Triathlon • Cycling economy • Running economy • Incline • Metabolic rate • Mechanical work rate Abbreviations α Treadmill inclination DE Delta efficiency DE cycle Delta efficiency during uphill cycling DE run Delta efficiency during uphill running ΔMR Change in metabolic rate ΔMWR Change in mechanical work rate g Gravitational acceleration GE Gross efficiency GE cycle Gross efficiency during uphill cycling at the lactate threshold GE run Gross efficiency during uphill running at the lactate threshold LT Lactate threshold, i.e. the mechanical work rate at which the blood-lactate concentration increased 1 mmol l −1 above the lowest measured value m tot Total mass of participant and equipment MR Metabolic rate MWR Mechanical work rate RER mean Mean respiratory exchange ratio μ Rolling-resistance coefficient of the bicyclė VO 2max Maximal oxygen uptakė VO 2mean Mean oxygen uptake * Tomas Carlsson

Elite Triathlete Profiles in Draft-Legal Triathlons as a Basis for Talent Identification

“…However, cycling and running’s gross efficiencies (calculated as the ratio between the mechanical work rate and metabolic rate) are positively correlated (r = 0.66; p = 0.038; R 2 0.44) [ 78 ]—that is, triathletes with a high cycling efficiency are also efficient runners.…”

Meta-Analysis of Carbohydrate Solution Intake during Prolonged Exercise in Adults: From the Last 45+ Years’ Perspective

“…Undoubtedly, the athletes' weight is one of the determinant factors of energy expenditure, running economy, and, consequently, endurance exercise performance [158]. As running is less mechanically efficient than cycling, runners during given mechanical work exercise would be expected to have greater energy requirements than cyclists; therefore, a runner's performance would be more CHO dependent [159]. This simply means that when both athletes ingest the same amount of CHO supplements, the cyclist may have a greater advantage in exercise performance compared to the runner, under similar work exercise conditions.…”

Metabolic Flexibility and Mechanical Efficiency in Women Over-60

“…Of uttermost importance, exercise efficiency is a complex term determined by the coordinated addition of the cardiorespiratory, metabolic, neuromuscular, and biomechanical efficiencies ( Barnes and Kilding, 2015 ). Cardiorespiratory and metabolic efficiencies are related to the supply of oxygen to force-producing muscles and the resynthesis of adenosine triphosphate in them, whereas neuromuscular and biomechanical efficiencies reflect the interactions between the neural and musculoskeletal systems ( Carlsson et al, 2020 ). This complexity explains that efficiency assessment encompasses several indexes which vary with the different protocols -e.g., Delta Efficiency (DE), Gross Efficiency (GE) and exercise economy (EC)-, as well as some inconsistencies regarding exercise in older adults.…”