1972
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.11.702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gross and Histologic Evaluation of an Autogenous Bone Graft 57 Months Postoperatively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, whether and to what extent the additional use of ACBP to EMD may affect the wound healing dynamics of deep periodontal defects compared to mere EMD application needs be clinically and histologically confirmed. In this respect, several histologic studies 41‐44 in humans demonstrated the periodontal regenerative potential of the autogenous bone, leading to cementum and bone formation. In contrast, inconsistent histologic results have been reported on the regenerative potential (i.e., presence and extent of newly formed bone and cementum) of EMD in the treatment of intraosseous defects 7,12,37,45‐48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether and to what extent the additional use of ACBP to EMD may affect the wound healing dynamics of deep periodontal defects compared to mere EMD application needs be clinically and histologically confirmed. In this respect, several histologic studies 41‐44 in humans demonstrated the periodontal regenerative potential of the autogenous bone, leading to cementum and bone formation. In contrast, inconsistent histologic results have been reported on the regenerative potential (i.e., presence and extent of newly formed bone and cementum) of EMD in the treatment of intraosseous defects 7,12,37,45‐48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last, ''osteointegration'' describes the surface bonding between the host bone and the grafting material (Constantino & Freidman, 1994). The most desirable form of bone substitute is the autologous bone graft for their superior osteoconduction, ease of incorporation, lack of immunological reactions, contains living bone cells that offer osteogenesis and growth factors that stimulate osteoinduction (Cypher & Grossman, 1996;Naber et al, 1972;Marciani et al, 1977). However, massive replacements of bone are not easily achieved by bone autografts as autogenous bone is limited in availability, and may result in the donar site morbidity (Mankin et al, 1976).…”
Section: Bioglass As Bone Graft Substitutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 - 10 The main disadvantage of intra-oral autogenous bone graft is the limited amount of intra-oral donor bone and the main disadvantages of extra-oral autogenous bone grafts such as iliac crest are the need for hospitalization, risk of potential ankylosis, and root resorption. 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%