2002
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-02-11513-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grothendieck classes of quiver varieties

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a formula for the structure sheaf of a quiver variety in the Grothendieck ring of its embedding variety. This formula generalizes and gives new expressions for Grothendieck polynomials. We furthermore conjecture that the coefficients in our formula have signs which alternate with degree. The proof of our formula involves K-theoretic generalizations of several useful cohomological tools, including the Thom-Porteous formula, the Jacobi-Trudi formula, and a Gysin formula of Pragacz.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A crucial property of arbitrary stable double Grothendieck polynomials, proved in [Buc02b, Theorem 6.13], is that every such polynomialĜ w (z/ż) has a unique expression is a sum of products of stable double Grothendieck polynomialsĜ µ j (x j−1 /x j ) for grassmannian permutations µ j , with uniquely determined integer coefficients c µ (r). That these coefficients are the same as in Corollary 16 follows from the fact that the right side above determines the same element in the n th tensor power of Buch's bialgebra Γ from [Buc02b,Buc02a] as does the right side of the top formula in Corollary 16.…”
Section: Sign Alternationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A crucial property of arbitrary stable double Grothendieck polynomials, proved in [Buc02b, Theorem 6.13], is that every such polynomialĜ w (z/ż) has a unique expression is a sum of products of stable double Grothendieck polynomialsĜ µ j (x j−1 /x j ) for grassmannian permutations µ j , with uniquely determined integer coefficients c µ (r). That these coefficients are the same as in Corollary 16 follows from the fact that the right side above determines the same element in the n th tensor power of Buch's bialgebra Γ from [Buc02b,Buc02a] as does the right side of the top formula in Corollary 16.…”
Section: Sign Alternationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This K-theoretic version is still in terms of lacing diagrams, but nonminimal diagrams contribute terms of higher degree. The motivating consequence is a conjecture of Buch on the sign-alternation of the coefficients appearing in his expansion of quiver K-polynomials in terms of stable Grothendieck polynomials for partitions [Buc02a]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope that the statements in the last two sections will be comprehensible after reading w and the first seven lines of w This paper came out of a project aimed at finding a formula for the structure sheaf of a quiver variety. We will present such a formula in [2], thus generalizing our earlier results with W. Fulton regarding the cohomology class of a quiver variety [3]. The proof A.S. BUCH of the cohomology formula was relatively simple, because some powerful cohomological tools related to the ring of symmetric functions were already available.…”
Section: Our Formula Implies That If C~ Is Not Zero Then U Is Contamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We believe that further developing this connection may allow one to, for example, prove a K-theory analogue of the "factor sequence formula" conjectured in [Buch and Fulton 1999] and proved in [Knutson et al 2006], which is a problem that has remained open in this topic; see [Buch 2002a;2005a]. (In [Buch et al 2008] a different factor sequence formula, generalizing the one given in [Buch 2005a], was given.…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, there has been significant interest in the Grothendieck ring of X and of related varieties; see work on, for example, quiver loci [Buch 2002a;2005a;Buch et al 2008], Hilbert series of determinantal ideals [Knutson and Miller 2005;Knutson et al 2008;2009], applications to invariants of matroids [Speyer 2006], and in relation to representation theory [Griffeth and Ram 2004;Lenart and Postnikov 2007;Willems 2006]. See also work of concerning combinatorial Hopf algebras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%