2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016sw001406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-based evaluation of dosimeters for NASA high-altitude balloon flight

Abstract: Results are presented from evaluations of radiation dosimeters prior to a NASA high‐altitude balloon flight, the RaD‐X mission. Four radiation dosimeters were on board RaD‐X: a Far West Hawk (version 3), a Teledyne dosimeter (UDOS001), a Liulin dosimeter (MDU 6SA1), and a RaySure dosimeter (version 3b). The Hawk is a tissue‐equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) and the others are solid‐state Si sensors. The Hawk served as the “flight standard” and was calibrated for this mission. The Si‐based dosimeters were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in material and detector size both support the notion that the Liulin should measure a dose lower than the TEPC in the upper atmosphere. Straume et al [] found that the Liulin may be biased high by 30%, so the calibration studies using the same instruments are consistent with the measurement results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences in material and detector size both support the notion that the Liulin should measure a dose lower than the TEPC in the upper atmosphere. Straume et al [] found that the Liulin may be biased high by 30%, so the calibration studies using the same instruments are consistent with the measurement results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Table shows the RaD‐X TEPC dose rate measurement along with dose rate in tissue calculated using the three GCR models. The TEPC was shown to perform extremely well when compared to National Institute of Standards and Technology‐traceable sources during calibration as shown in Straume et al []. For both altitudes, the DLR model provided the boundary flux which came closest to modeling the TEPC dose rate.…”
Section: Comparison To Rad‐x Dose Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activity levels for the 252 Cf source used in our simulations are 2.04 ± 0.1 ×10 6 s −1 for the neutron activity [ Kelm , ; Straume et al , ] and 9.06 ×10 6 s −1 for the gamma‐ray activity (in agreement with Fortune [] but higher than Chyzh et al []). The neutron and gamma‐ray Cf fission spectra were simulated using realistic functions, based on measurements, which follow a power law function at high energies [ Verbinski et al , ; Fortune , ; Billnert et al , ].…”
Section: Validation Of the Geant‐4 Modelsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The explanation for this may be systematic. In pre‐flight calibrations, using a Co‐60 gamma source, the TEPC was observed to underestimate absorbed dose by approximately 16% [ Straume et al, ]. During the same experiments the ratio between a facility reference value of absorbed dose in tissue, and the value measured by RaySure in silicon, was 1.21.…”
Section: Comparison With Tepc Datamentioning
confidence: 97%