Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icgpr.2014.6970527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-coupled antenna array for step-frequency GPR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical technique to increase penetration employed in GPR surveys is the reduction of the operating frequency: this implies lower resolution [1]. An alternative approach, where applicable, requires the employment of ground-coupled antennas [2]. Those antennas increase the coupling with the soil avoiding the first reflection at the interface between air and soil and potentially reducing the speed of a survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical technique to increase penetration employed in GPR surveys is the reduction of the operating frequency: this implies lower resolution [1]. An alternative approach, where applicable, requires the employment of ground-coupled antennas [2]. Those antennas increase the coupling with the soil avoiding the first reflection at the interface between air and soil and potentially reducing the speed of a survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COST Action TU1208 was running from April 2013 to October 2017 [4,5]. It involved more than 300 experts from 150 partner institutes in 28 COST countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom), a COST cooperating state (Israel), 6 COST near neighboring countries (Albania, Armenia, Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Ukraine) and 6 COST international partner countries (Australia, Colombia, Hong Kong, The Philippines, Rwanda, the United States). University researchers, software developers, civil and electronic engineers, archaeologists, geophysics experts, non-destructive testing equipment designers and manufacturers, end-users from private companies and public agencies participated in the Action.…”
Section: Cost Action Tu1208 and The Open Database Of Radargrams Initimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second assumption is a standard accepted approach for safety reasons. However, a lot of emitted energy is reflected back because the antenna is suspended above the surface and the coupling process efficiency is lower [29], [30] [31]. Figure 3 provides an example of the energy and resolution losses experienced by elevating the antenna of few centimetres above the surface.…”
Section: Target and Acquisition Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%