2013
DOI: 10.1785/0120130088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Motion in the Presence of Complex Topography: Earthquake and Ambient Noise Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we estimate that the low-frequency amplification, likely to be influenced by the general hill topography as explained in the previous section, is not reproduced at all by the ambient vibration HVSR; only some weak resonance effects can be observed for the higher frequency range that was attributed above to surface layer amplification. A similar observation was made by [19], who noted that SSR presents the clearest low-frequency peak for earthquakes recorded along a ridge in the San Francisco Bay area (in their case near 1 Hz). They interpreted this peak as the fundamental one related to topographic amplification.…”
Section: The Use Of Hvsr For Site Effect Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, we estimate that the low-frequency amplification, likely to be influenced by the general hill topography as explained in the previous section, is not reproduced at all by the ambient vibration HVSR; only some weak resonance effects can be observed for the higher frequency range that was attributed above to surface layer amplification. A similar observation was made by [19], who noted that SSR presents the clearest low-frequency peak for earthquakes recorded along a ridge in the San Francisco Bay area (in their case near 1 Hz). They interpreted this peak as the fundamental one related to topographic amplification.…”
Section: The Use Of Hvsr For Site Effect Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Boore, 1973;Massa et al, 2014;Poursartip et al, 2017). Both seismic noise analysis and strong motion records confirm that stronger shaking often occurs at topographic highs (Chávez-García et al, 1996;Durante et al, 2017;Hartzell et al, 2014;Massa et al, 2010). Meunier et al (2008) suggested that earthquakeinduced landslides tend to cluster around ridge crests as a consequence of these topographic site effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, slopes adjacent to the active fault, where the largest earthquake effects are expected, are unlikely to have DSGSD scarps because they are principally features on and around ridges rather than on lower slopes near valleys (Figure a). In addition, many studies suggest that dynamic ground motion is amplified on ridges (e.g., Geli et al, ; Hartzell et al, ), whereas static crustal strain generally is smaller under a mountain because it represents additional elastic material that resists deformation (e.g., Segall, ; Williams & Wadge, ). However, these complex effects are not taken into account in our calculation.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%