2016
DOI: 10.1515/intag-2016-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground penetrating radar for underground sensing in agriculture: a review

Abstract: Belowground properties strongly affect agricultural productivity. Traditional methods for quantifying belowground properties are destructive, labor-intensive and pointbased. Ground penetrating radar can provide non-invasive, areal, and repeatable underground measurements. This article reviews the application of ground penetrating radar for soil and root measurements and discusses potential approaches to overcome challenges facing ground penetrating radar-based sensing in agriculture, especially for soil physic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical methods, such as ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electric resistivity tomography (ERT), enable detailed descriptions of the subsurface's geological structure through the dielectric and electric resistivity field of its sediment (Davis and Annan, 1989;Samouëlian et al, 2005;Haaken et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016). Both the sediment's dielectric and resistivity properties are strongly impacted by the its water content and chemical composition (Orlando, 2013;Vera et al, 2016).…”
Section: Common Methods For Vadose Zone Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical methods, such as ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electric resistivity tomography (ERT), enable detailed descriptions of the subsurface's geological structure through the dielectric and electric resistivity field of its sediment (Davis and Annan, 1989;Samouëlian et al, 2005;Haaken et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016). Both the sediment's dielectric and resistivity properties are strongly impacted by the its water content and chemical composition (Orlando, 2013;Vera et al, 2016).…”
Section: Common Methods For Vadose Zone Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground penetrating radar (GPR), another geophysical technique of similar throughput to EMI, uses high frequency radio waves to detect objects or boundaries between materials in the ground based on their permittivity. GPR, like EMI, has been used to detect and quantify tree roots, but does not currently have the resolution to detect roots less than 2 mm in diameter (reviewed in [ 47 ]). Despite this, GPR has recently been used to detect bulk root biomass in wheat and sugar cane (although with limited ability to detect differences between genotypes [ 48 ]) and shows potential as a future phenotyping tool, perhaps in combination with other geophysical sensors.…”
Section: Root Phenotyping In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median was thus calculated for each plot, and the resulting set of median feature values was correlated with harvested biomass measures. (Savelyev and Sato 2004), and to lter signals (Liu et al 2016). Wavelet application in agricultural root detection is based on the supposition that, similarly to spectrophotometry performed in a wet lab, distinct root sizes or structures will preferentially respond to speci c frequency components of a probing electromagnetic wave.…”
Section: Time Domain Signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%