1965
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-196506000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Roughness Effects on the Energy and Angular Distribution of Gamma Radiation from Fallout

Abstract: This report is published in the interest of providing information which may prove of value to the reader in his study of effects data derived principally from nuclear weapons tests and from experiments designed to duplicate various characteristics of nuclear weapons. This document is based on information available at the time of preparation which may have subsequently been expanded and re-evaluated. Also, in preparing this report for publication, some classified material may have been removed. Users are cautio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy and angular exposure rate distributions above fallout fields have been measured (HUDDLESTON et al, 1965) and calculated (SPENCER, 1962). The radioisotope 6oCo can be used to simulate fallout radiation fields for shielding studies, provided the correct angular distribution is produced on the outside of the shield (BURSON and FRENCH, 1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy and angular exposure rate distributions above fallout fields have been measured (HUDDLESTON et al, 1965) and calculated (SPENCER, 1962). The radioisotope 6oCo can be used to simulate fallout radiation fields for shielding studies, provided the correct angular distribution is produced on the outside of the shield (BURSON and FRENCH, 1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this report is focused on isolated buildings, it is worth noting that roughness in the earth's surface also provides protection -due in large part to the reduction of direct radiation [9], [30], [35]. The corresponding protection factors range from PF = 1.5 for natural, small-scale (≀ 0.125 m) roughness, PF = 3 at the centers of large 300 m (1,000 ft) hills and valleys, and potentially larger for congested urban areas…”
Section: Exterior Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where DR = dose rate at point P (rad s -1 ) Ξ¨ = conversion from photon flux to dose rate (rad photon -1 cm 2 ) SC = surface contamination (photon cm -2 s -1 ) B(FP) = buildup factor (dimensionless) FP = number of mean free path lengths (dimensionless) 30 dA = (infinitely small) area of point A (cm 2 ) s = distance from points A to P, also called the slant range (cm) h = height of point P (cm) r = distance from the center of fallout disk to point A (cm) Β΅ = mass attenuation coefficient (cm 2 g -1 ) ρ = air density (g cm -3 ) 29 The dose rate scales with s 2 since it depends on the surface area of an expanding sphere. 30 The mean free path is the average distance radiation will travel in a straight line. For the radiation energies considered here (0.5 to 3 MeV), this corresponds to a distance of ~100 to ~250 m in air.…”
Section: Appendix C: Theoretical Calculation Of Unshielded Dose Rate ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations