“…Although the WC 5 Si spine is slightly bowed, this distortion is not reproduced in the optimized geometry (DFT:B3LYP-LANL2DZ, gas phase,S PA RTAN-18), indicating that it is as oft response to crystal packing forces.T he frontier molecular orbitals derived from this geometry ( Figure 2) suggest considerable electronic delocalization along the WC 5 spine.B ased on these orbitals,t he color of complex 2 (Figure 3) would appear to arise from two absorptions of interest. Thef irst weak absorption (l max = 562 nm) corresponds to ad xy !p* WC transition [10] whilst the second considerably more intense absorption (l max = 403 nm) is attributed primarily to p WC !p* WC ,that is,from the W C p-bonding orbital to the WC p-antibonding orbital, both of which are extensively delocalized along the C 5 spine.T hese are both to higher wavelength of the corresponding absorptions for [W(CSiMe 3 )(CO) 2 (Tp*)] and [W(CÀCCSiMe 3 )-(CO) 2 (Tp*)]. [4a] Theenergies,calculated at the same level of theory,ofthe corresponding orbitals for the known "C 1 "[ W( CSiMe 3 )-(CO) 2 (Tp*)] and "C 3 "[ W(CCCSiMe 3 )(CO) 2 (Tp*)] congeners are also presented in Figure 2, from which it is clear that 1) the d xy orbital, which is primarily associated with W(CO) 2 retro-donation, is essentially invariant across the series such that increases in the l max for the d xy !p* WC transition are due to progressive conjugative stabilization of the p* WC orbitals (LUMO, LUMO + 1), and 2) the pair of p WC orbitals (HOMOÀ1, HOMOÀ2) increase in energy with chain extension resulting in an increase in both the intensity (e)a nd wavelength of the p WC !p* WC absorption(s).…”