Grounded Theory Methodology: Comparison of Glaserian and Straussian Versions

Petružytė, Donata

doi:10.15388/socmintvei.2008.1.6048

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Duomenys grindžiamojoje teorijoje gali būti kiekybiniai arba kokybiniai, gali būti ir abiejų tipų duomenų kombinacija (šioje tyrimo dalyje analizuoti tik kokybiniai duomenys). Duomenims rinkti taip pat gali būti pasitelkiami skirtingi metodai, pagrindiniu laikomas nestruktūruotas arba pusiau struktūruotas interviu, tačiau duomenys gali būti renkami grupinių diskusijų metu, atliekant stebėjimą, renkant dokumentų, laikraščių, knygų iškarpas ir pan., t. y. viską, kas gali padėti rasti atsakymus į tyrimo metu iškilusius klausimus (Petružytė, 2008). Remiantis Glaseriu (2001), "viskas yra duomenys".…”

Section: Tyrimo Metodologijaunclassified

“…Šiame nuolatiniame duomenų rinkimo, lyginimo tarpusavyje ir atmintinių rašymo cikle išskiriamas atviro kodavimo etapas, nes jau jo metu ėmė ryškėti skaitmeninių žaidimų stereotipų ir stereotipizavimo kategorijos. Kiti etapai (atrankinis kodavimas ir teorinis kodavimas) sustiprino ir papildė iškilusius konceptus (Petružytė, 2008;Scott, 2009).…”

Section: Tyrimo Metodologijaunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stereotyping of Digital Games

Vitytė

2019

PED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article analyses the stereotyping characteristics of digital games. It presents research data obtained by the classical Glaser’s strategy version of the Grounded Theory. The results of the research demonstrate that digital games are not often perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon but, instead, they are understood through one or several properties of the game, i.e. through stereotyping.The following dominant stereotypes applicable to digital games (Digital games are addictive; They reduce children’s creativity and skills; Girls do not play. Games are not a feminine thing; Digital games are no art; They promote aggressive behaviour; A game is a game. Science is science; When playing, people do not think; The goal is to make people addicted to the product) are analysed in terms of stereotype forming characteristics associated with digital games, in terms of stereotype formation stages, and in terms of maintaining, changing and denying stereotypes.Feelings, emotions, initial experience influencing any new experiences, and social context are important factors of the stereotype formation process related to digital games. Stereotype formation stages described by other researchers are also characteristic of the stereotypes applicable to digital games. The stereotypes of digital games are maintained through: illusory correlation and assimilation, attributional and automatic processes and, also, by the fact that they often are self-fulfilling prophecies. The existing stereotypes on digital games are resistant but they can still be changed. The researchers have distinguished between the following stereotype change models: bookkeeping, conversion, subtyping, and exemplar-based model, which can also be seen in the stereotype change mechanisms related to digital games.

show abstract

Section: Tyrimo Metodologijaunclassified

Stereotyping of Digital Games

Vitytė

2019

PED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Teorinė atranka yra duomenų rinkimas, valdomas iš teorijos kylančių koncepcijų ir pagrįstas lyginimo idėja. Jos tikslas yra ieškoti žmonių, vietų ar įvykių, kurie padėtų rasti koncepcijų atmainas ir kategorijų dimensijų bei savybių gausą ir įvairovę (Petružytė, 2008). Tiriamųjų atranka interviu ar stebėjimui atliekama taip, kad kiekvienas naujas atvejis suteiktų papildomos ir naujos informacijos, reikalingos kuriant koncepcines kategorijas.…”

Section: Procesasunclassified

“…Tad dėl šių panašumų lyginti GT atmainas tampa dar sudėtingiau. Vis dėlto D. Petružytė (2008) pastebi, kad GT atmainų neatitikimai susiję ne su terminais, o su tyrimo procesais.…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

“…kuriose knygose ir moksliniuose straipsniuose nagrinėjami konkretūs procedūriniai ar kitokie GT atmainų neatitikimai (Petružytė, 2008), tačiau skirtingos informacijos apie GT metodologiją gausa gali trukdyti tyrėjui suvokti esminius GT principus. Tad šiame straipsnyje keliamas tyrimo klausimas: koks yra GT tyrimo priemonių sudarymo procesas, parametrai ir rezultatai?…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of Instruments for Grounded Theory Research: Process, Parameters and Results

Bagdonaitė-Stelmokienė

Žydžiūnaitė

2016

PED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grounded Theory (hereinafter – GT) is considered one of the most widely used research methodologies in social sciences. Due to different versions of GT, the development of instruments for research still poses particular questions. The article addresses the following research question: what are the process, parameters and outcomes (results) of development of instruments for research under different versions of GT? The aim is to summarize the methodological regularities and the logic of tools’ development within the different versions of GT. Though the research procedures applied in different versions of GT are slightly different, they share some common aspects: theoretical sampling is usually applied; an interview is employed for data collection (though other additional methods are used as well). GT analysis starts as early as data collection, while the result of GT is a new independent theory describing, explaining and substantiating the phenomenon. The GT is understood as contextual and situational theory rather than universally applied abstract theory. An interview is the key data collection method across all versions of GT. Despite the particular methodological differences, the main highlight of all versions of GT is the fluctuation (changeability) and the variability of instruments’s content, what means the (possible) change of questions of interviews ir criterions for observations, or document analysis. On the one hand, it expands the researcher’s possibilities; on the other hand, the researcher faces an overload of information which is difficult to cope with.

show abstract

The Impact of Social Business on the Development of Communities’ Social Capital

Ramaškienė

Šumskienė

2020

STEPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There have been a lot of interest in social economics development in Europe, and social business has stood out for its social impact, having a potential approach to such societal problems as social exclusion, poverty, unemployment. The creation of social capital and social entrepreneurship are related by positive social change and economic benefits, which are achieved through personal and community bonding, innovation, and social initiatives. Social business has stood out for its social impact, having a potential approach to such societal problems as social exclusion, poverty, unemployment. The aim of the present article is to reveal social entrepreneurship impact on building social capital in Lithuanian communities. For this reason, a qualitative study was conducted based on social business activities related to community change, as well as identifying the interrelations between social business and social capital. This article introduces the theoretical approach of concepts social capital and community, followed by discussion of social business benefits and impact on the growth of community’s social capital. The results of the analysis of the research data were analytically coded based on grounded theory methodology and reveals the potential and perspective of social business in creating social change in the community following by building new relationships, trust and values, and new norms for community development. The positive changes initiated by social business are relevant to the goals of social work and reveal the need of further research in this field.

show abstract

Grounded Theory Methodology: Comparison of Glaserian and Straussian Versions

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Stereotyping of Digital Games

Stereotyping of Digital Games

Development of Instruments for Grounded Theory Research: Process, Parameters and Results

The Impact of Social Business on the Development of Communities’ Social Capital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About