2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-016-9707-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grounding the financialization of farmland: perspectives on financial actors as new land owners in rural Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably absent from this approach, however, is a concept of engagement with, and contribution to, rural communities. Similar to findings from another rural community in central New South Wales (Sippel, Larder, & Lawrence, 2016), our informants in Dunoon did not oppose the financial goals of the company, as such. Rather, they felt that their rights to have their health protected and their environment unpolluted were being compromised and sought to participate in shaping their community's future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Remarkably absent from this approach, however, is a concept of engagement with, and contribution to, rural communities. Similar to findings from another rural community in central New South Wales (Sippel, Larder, & Lawrence, 2016), our informants in Dunoon did not oppose the financial goals of the company, as such. Rather, they felt that their rights to have their health protected and their environment unpolluted were being compromised and sought to participate in shaping their community's future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Once the complicated emerging global relations of agricultural ownership, production and distribution became clearer, the term 'land grab' increasingly gave way to a more nuanced understanding under the header of the 'global land rush' (Borras et al, 2011;Li, 2014Li, , 2015Ouma, 2014). A wide range of actors drives this rush: agri-food companies sought to secure their inputs and consolidate market share (Amanor, 2012;Clapp, 2012;Cotula, 2012;McMichael, 2012;White et al, 2012); state-owned enterprises attempted to secure food supplies (Larder et al, 2015;Sippel, 2015;Woertz, 2013); andperhaps receiving the most attentiona growing number of financial actors sought some degree of involvement in farmland and agricultural production (Buxton et al, 2012;Clapp, 2012;Clapp & Isakson, 2018;Cotula, 2012;Fairbairn, 2014;Isakson, 2014;Ouma, 2020;Sippel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Measuring and Regulating The Global Land Rushmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the most wellstudied cases capture the diversity of approaches during the recent years of the land rush. Some states such as Australia (Larder et al, 2015;Magnan, 2015;Sippel, 2018;Sippel et al, 2017), Russia (Visser et al, 2012) and Ethiopia (Lavers, 2012) have welcomed foreign investment, while others such as Argentina (Perrone, 2013), Brazil (Fairbairn, 2015;Wilkinson et al, 2012) and Canada (Desmarais et al, 2017;Magnan, 2015;Magnan & Sunley, 2017) have followed a more cautious path.…”
Section: Measuring and Regulating The Global Land Rushmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desmarais, Qualman, Magnan, & Wiebe, 2017;Magnan, 2015), Australia (e.g. Larder, Sippel, & Lawrence, 2015;Sippel, Larder, & Lawrence, 2017), China (e.g. Mills, 2018), BRICS countries (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%