2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23303-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater oxygen isotope anomaly before the M6.6 Tottori earthquake in Southwest Japan

Abstract: Geochemical monitoring of groundwater in seismically-active regions has been carried out since 1970s. Precursors were well documented, but often criticized for anecdotal or fragmentary signals, and for lacking a clear physico-chemical explanation for these anomalies. Here we report – as potential seismic precursor – oxygen isotopic ratio anomalies of +0.24‰ relative to the local background measured in groundwater, a few months before the Tottori earthquake (M 6.6) in Southwest Japan. Samples were deep groundwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The [Na+K]/Si, Na/K, and [Na+K]/Ca ratios as well as conductivity, alkalinity, and Cl concentrations began increasing 3-5 weeks before the Mw 5.3 earthquake whereas the Ba/Sr ratio began decreasing 3-6 days before the Mw 5.0 earthquake (Skelton et al, 2008). In 2017, oxygen isotopic ratio anomalies of +0.24 0 / 00 relative to the local background were recorded in groundwater a few months before the Mw 6.6 Tottori earthquake in southwest Japan (5 km from the epicenter; Onda et al, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Useful Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The [Na+K]/Si, Na/K, and [Na+K]/Ca ratios as well as conductivity, alkalinity, and Cl concentrations began increasing 3-5 weeks before the Mw 5.3 earthquake whereas the Ba/Sr ratio began decreasing 3-6 days before the Mw 5.0 earthquake (Skelton et al, 2008). In 2017, oxygen isotopic ratio anomalies of +0.24 0 / 00 relative to the local background were recorded in groundwater a few months before the Mw 6.6 Tottori earthquake in southwest Japan (5 km from the epicenter; Onda et al, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Useful Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, one of us (Tiziana Sgroi) manually picked the most recent earthquakes (2013-2017) following the same procedure adopted by the analysts of ISC 1985and ISB 2003 Combining the picked arrival time data with the arrival time data from the analyzed bulletins, Tiziana Sgroi relocated all earthquakes (Table S1 in the Supplement). Moreover, to understand the kinematics of the seismic faulting, we collected earthquake focal mechanisms (Table S2) from the European-Mediterranean Regional Centroid-Moment Tensor (RCMT) catalog (http://rcmt2.bo.ingv.it/, last access: 15 May 2019) and from previous papers by Orecchio et al (2014) and Polonia et al (2016). Earthquake data (Tables S1 and S2) are shown in map view in Figs.…”
Section: Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquake epicenters and focal mechanisms (Tables S1 and S2) surrounding the BMV area are shown as dots (black and white) and beach balls, respectively. Focal mechanisms (Table S2) are from the European-Mediterranean Regional Centroid-Moment Tensor (red beach ball) catalog (http://rcmt2.bo.ingv.it/, last access: 15 May 2019) and from previous papers (blue beach balls) by Orecchio et al (2014) and Polonia et al (2016). White dots represent the selected seismic events at an arbitrary distance of 12 km to be projected along the transect A-A' (blue line).…”
Section: Bathymetry and Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is imperative to conduct research in this direction to mitigate the associated geohazards and minimize the loss of life and property. In this regard, numerous retrospective studies highlight the presence of atmospheric, ionospheric, and hydrogeochemical processes accompanied by earthquake activity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. These accompanying processes are considered as earthquake precursors and observed globally [11,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%