Groundwater sustainability: Developing a non-cooperative optimal management scenario in shared groundwater resources under water bankruptcy conditions

Yazdian, Mehdi; Rakhshandehroo, Gholamreza; Nikoo, Mohammad Reza; Mooselu, Mehrdad Ghorbani; Gandomi, Amir H.; Honar, T

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112807

Cited by 28 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This reallocation method prioritizes stakeholders based on lower demands (Equation 3). This process entails first estimating the reallocations of stakeholders with minimum demands, followed by repeating the same procedure for other stakeholders (Yazdian et al 2021).…”

Section: Weighted Constrained Equal Awards Methods (Wcea)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two-level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework

Virani,

Sabbaghian,

Roghani

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global rising demand for exploiting limited shared groundwater resources, coupled with significant water deficit, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, has led to escalating conflicts among stakeholders. As such, using Bankruptcy Theory methods can be an appropriate response to the reallocation of resources. This study introduces a novel approach to weighted Bankruptcy, where the relative importance of stakeholders is determined by their contributions to sustainable development, and their claims’ impact on shared groundwater resources is considered. The framework is implemented in a two-level bankruptcy process including the plains and their beneficiaries (agriculture, drinking and industry). The proposed two-level weighted bankruptcy process applies to the Neyshabour-Ataiyeh-Sabzevar plains in Iran. Moreover, a Weighted Combinational Contribution-Claim (WCCC) method is proposed comparing with the other weighted methods such as Proportionality (WPRO), Constrained Equal Awards (WCEA), Pinile (WPIN), Talmud (WTAL), Constrained Equal Losses (WCEL), Modified Constrained Equal Losses (MWCEL), which are considered in two categories including the deficit-based and resource-based approaches. According to the Bankruptcy Allocation Stability Index (BASI), the preferred deficit-based method in the first reallocation level is the WCEL, while the preferred resources-based method is the WCEA. In the second reallocation level, the proposed WCCC is chosen as the preferred deficit-based method for all beneficiaries. Among the resources-based methods, the WPRO method is preferred for Neyshabour's beneficiaries. Also, the WTAL method is preferred for Sabzevar's and Ataiyeh's beneficiaries. The novel approach offers a promising solution to the water resource reallocation problem, ensuring a more equitable and sustainable management of shared groundwater resources.

show abstract

Section: Weighted Constrained Equal Awards Methods (Wcea)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two-level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework

Virani,

Sabbaghian,

Roghani

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These official figures and data are of great significance to us in making an allocation plan. M. Yazdian applys the theory to groundwater sustainability to develop a non-cooperative optimal management scenario in shared groundwater resources under water bankruptcy conditions [11]. Considering the uncertainty of railway rescue, Tang used the Talmud bankruptcy distribution for fuzzy demand of the accident point between resource scheduling [12].…”

Section: Literature Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Distribution System of Coronavirus Based on Talmud Bankruptcy Distribution

Hong¹,

Li²,

Xie³

2021

Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At present, the world is suffering from COVID-19, and many countries do not have the conditions to develop a vaccine. Countries that are without the COVID-19 vaccine are still at risk of a worsening epidemic and potential sequelae, people are dying because of inadequate medical resources and medical technology, global distribution of vaccines is therefore imperative. Consequently, the equitable distribution method of vaccines from countries that can produce them to other countries would be a top priority for stabilizing the epidemic worldwide. In order to develop an equitable vaccine distribution scheme, we use literature research method, model analysis method and comparative analysis method. After searching the data and literature, we find a case in the Talmud based on the principle of contested garment, the Talmud Bankruptcy problem. A complete and fair vaccine distribution plan according to the dispute overcoat principle is then made according to the contested garment principle. At the same time, through the comparison with the proportional distribution method, the advantages of the contested garment principle in highlighting fairness can be more prominent. In the discussion section, we show the various factors that influence the distribution of COVID-19 vaccine, encompassing economic and cost factor, political and international relationship factor, priority problem and demographic factor as well as science and technology factor. The model allocation method that we choose cannot consider too many of these realistic factors, but they would more or less affect the final vaccine allocation results. Fair distribution method for new vaccine research can be provided to producing-vaccinecountries a certain consideration that how to distribute surplus vaccine to other countries, also can arouse the attention for fair distribution of vaccine of other relevant personage and organization, accelerate the development and research of more realistic, more feasible vaccine distribution system and their implementation, distinctly promote the outbreak of stability in the world.

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, other scholars have considered spatial variability of river basins users, Ansink and Weikard (2012) transfer an basin-based bankruptcy problem to a linear order two-agent sharing problem, and Goetz et al (2008) define two different sequential allocation rules that respect asymmetry. Recent years, many studies integrate bankruptcy theory with other game-based theory to explore new allocation methods: Degefu et al ( , 2017Degefu et al ( , 2018 systematically combine bankruptcy framework with the bargaining theory, Yuan et al (2017) construct a cooperation bankruptcy game model, and Yazdian et al (2021) develop a non-cooperative optimal management scenario under bankruptcy conditions.…”

Section: Reasonable Allocation Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Allocation Management Under Scarcity: A Bankruptcy Approach

Zheng

Sang

Liu

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study hopes to develop multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method for equitable and efficient allocation water resource under scarcity. Based on the Bankruptcy problems, five classic plus one proposed allocation rules are introduced to generate water distribution alternatives. The "Core" solution of Cooperative Game Theory (CGT) and Security Restriction have been used to select the feasible alternatives. Additionally, five voting methods in Social Choice Theory (SCT) are launched to aggregate preferences and obtain "win" alternative. Apply this model on 2030 water allocation management project of Ezhou City, China, as a case study. Under the proposed rule, adjust minimal overlap rule (AMO), five regions, Urban Area, Gedian DZ and three counties, hold the water deficit rate of 5.9%, 15.8% and 4.7%-6.1%, respectively. By voting technique, AMO wins four fifths of aggregating processes and came in the second for the last, which provides some insights for allocating water in a fair and feasible way.

show abstract

Groundwater sustainability: Developing a non-cooperative optimal management scenario in shared groundwater resources under water bankruptcy conditions

Cited by 28 publications

References 51 publications

Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two-level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework

Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two-level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework

Construction of Distribution System of Coronavirus Based on Talmud Bankruptcy Distribution

Water Allocation Management Under Scarcity: A Bankruptcy Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About