“…This concept, that showed the importance of dissymmetry at the metal centre, was soon aer generalized to d 0 Mo and W catalysts, [M(E)(] CHR)(X)(Y)] with M(E) ¼ Mo/W(imido/oxo) (Scheme 1), 68,69 and shown to be a predictive guiding principle for the metathesis catalyst design not only in heterogeneous but also in homogeneous systems such as MAP, 25,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] MAC, 79,80 or NHC-stabilized cationic catalysts. [81][82][83][84][85] Metallacyclobutane intermediates of W-based catalysts are usually more stable than those of their Mo-based congeners and are oen observed; the Mo analogues are rarely reported for either homogeneous or well-dened silica-supported systems. 25,86 Computational results indicate that weaker s-donating ligands X and Y lead to more stable metallacyclobutane intermediates, and the isomerization between the two metallacyclobutane isomers (TBP and SP) via a turnstile process tends to be more facile for W as compared to Mo and for weaker s-donor ligands.…”