Group Climate's Principal Dimension: Affiliation

Hurley, John R.; Brooks, Lori J.

doi:10.1080/00207284.1987.11491061

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Carson (1969) regarded Sociability, one of only three major factors that Carter (1954) found to influence behavior in diverse groups of adult males, as an index of the "affiliation-disaffiliation dimension" (p. 99). Affiliativeness also was identified recently as the dimension most salient in diverse inventories of the socioemotional climate of personal growth and/or psychotherapeutic groups (Hurley & Brooks, 1987).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does FIRO-B relate better to interpersonal or intrapersonal behavior?

Hurley

1990

J. Clin. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After meeting for 33 hours over 7 weeks, 64 undergraduates from 11 small interpersonal skills groups rated themselves on Schutz's (1958) Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientations‐Behavior (FIRO‐B). Three weeks and 17 more group interaction hours later, they also described each samegroup participant, including self, on Lorr and McNair's (1963) Interpersonal Behavior Inventory (IBI). Correlations between self‐ratings on 6 FIRO‐B and 15 IBI scales yielded 25 significant statistically (p <.05) values, but merely 5 among FIRO‐B's 90 parallel correlations with individual's mean IBI ratings from pooled small group peers. Of all 30 significant correlations, 19 linked FIRO‐B's overlapping affection and inclusion measures positively, but narrowly, with 4 IBI scales that address affiliativeness/sociability. The findings challenge Schutz's (1958) paradoxical claim that FIRO‐B validly assesses interpersonal behavior by an intrapersonal method.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does FIRO-B relate better to interpersonal or intrapersonal behavior?

Hurley

1990

J. Clin. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They may, however, operate differently or be experienced differently by different groups. 3 subscales (T) and client (C), T-C Likert scale, studied and commonly used measure Horvath & agreement on tasks and goals self-report very good of alliance in the current Greenburg, 1989) of therapy bond between literature Therapist (T) and client (C), T-C Empathy Scale (ES; 10 items Clients' perceptions of Various Adequate Probably the most Burns, 1994) the therapist's warmth, Likert internal commonly used measure genuineness and scales, self-consistency, of empathy in the empathy report predicts individual literature outcome strongly Other studies, including Johnson et al (2005), have questioned this factor structure (Hurley & Brooks, 1987;Hurley & Brooks, 1988;Kay, 1996). For example, Hurley & Brooks (1987) suggest the GCQ to have one factor, which they named Affiliative vs.…”

Section: Group Climatementioning

confidence: 99%

Group Questionnaire: A New Measure of the Group Relationship

Krogel¹

2006

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY As chair of the candidate's graduate committee, I have read the dissertation of JulieAnn Krogel in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographical style are consistent and acceptable and fulfill university and department style requirements; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the graduate committee and is ready for submission to the university library.

show abstract

“…Individuals' perceptions of affiliativeness within sessions of their group therapy were addressed by 10 items from MacKenzie's (1981) Group Climate Questionnaire (GCQ), which were shown to provide a bipolar measure of affiliativeness (Hurley & Brooks, 1987. This scale included quintets of items scored positively (Cared, Participated, Reasoned, Revealed, and Confronted) and negatively (Rejected, Angry, Anxious, Avoided, and Withdrawn).…”

Section: Situational Affiliativenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Within the group psychotherapy arena, the affiliativeness that one perceives within a specific environment, or situational, affiliativeness, has been defined as "promoting helpfulness and emotional support" (Silbergeld et ah, 1975) and as "Cared for versus Rejected" (Hurley & Brooks, 1987). Support was also a major feature of caring behavior by group leaders that correlated importantly with members' benefits in Lieberman, Yalom, and Miles' (1973) benchmark study of encounter groups.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…, has been advanced to account more satisfactorily for group psychotherapy outcomes (Hurley, 1989;Hurley & Brooks, 1987. Within the group psychotherapy arena, the affiliativeness that one perceives within a specific environment, or situational, affiliativeness, has been defined as "promoting helpfulness and emotional support" (Silbergeld et ah, 1975) and as "Cared for versus Rejected" (Hurley & Brooks, 1987).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation