2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group decision making based on incomplete intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this proposed methodology, we develop the related methods to make them more effective. Example 1 can show the importance of considering geometry consistency degree, rather than paying more attention to calculating the missing elements in the reference of [44]. The illustrative study demonstrates the applicable of the proposed model.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this proposed methodology, we develop the related methods to make them more effective. Example 1 can show the importance of considering geometry consistency degree, rather than paying more attention to calculating the missing elements in the reference of [44]. The illustrative study demonstrates the applicable of the proposed model.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The final results calculated by Jiang et al [44] is: S(α 1 ) = 6.0127, S(α 2 ) = 0.5342, S(α 3 ) = 0.2766, S(α 4 ) = 0.4939, S(α 5 ) = 6.0250, with a ranking…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The management of incomplete information has been studied by many researchers [45,46], and lots of methods have been developed for the determination of criteria weights with incomplete information, such as those based on technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) [19], distance measure [47] and entropy method [48]. In the QFD literature, however, little research has been conducted to estimate the weights of CRs when the weight information is incompletely known.…”
Section: Determine the Importance Weights Of Crsmentioning
confidence: 99%