2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group M consensus Gag and Nef peptides are as efficient at detecting clade A1 and D cross-subtype T-cell functions as subtype-specific consensus peptides

Abstract: Objective-Evaluating HIV-1 specific T-cell response in African populations is sometimes compromised by extensive virus diversity and paucity of non-clade B reagents. We evaluated whether consensus group M (ConM) peptides could serve as comparable substitutes for detecting immune responses in clade A and clade D HIV-1 infection.Methods-Frequencies, breadths and polyfunctionality (≥3 functions: IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α and Perforin) of HIV-specific responses utilizing ConM, ConA and ConD Gag and Nef peptides was compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cryopreserved PBMCs from previously defined IFN-γ ELISpot positive specimens to Con M (n = 31) and previously determined IFN-γ ELISpot negative specimens to Adenovirus (n = 5) were thawed, rested overnight and stimulated with Con M and Ad peptides, respectively, before they were further evaluated for other functions using flow cytometry. All PBMCs were stimulated with their respective antigens for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO 2 incubator; and stained with specified fluorochrome antibodies, as previously described [25]. Briefly, trypan blue exclusion counting was used to select groups of 500,000 live PBMCs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cryopreserved PBMCs from previously defined IFN-γ ELISpot positive specimens to Con M (n = 31) and previously determined IFN-γ ELISpot negative specimens to Adenovirus (n = 5) were thawed, rested overnight and stimulated with Con M and Ad peptides, respectively, before they were further evaluated for other functions using flow cytometry. All PBMCs were stimulated with their respective antigens for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO 2 incubator; and stained with specified fluorochrome antibodies, as previously described [25]. Briefly, trypan blue exclusion counting was used to select groups of 500,000 live PBMCs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of other cellular immune functions is commonly performed only among those T-cells initially identified to be IFN-γ secreting using the ‘back-gating’ procedure of flow cytometry analysis [20], or using ELISpot assay screening for individuals with positive IFN-γ secretion [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells that lack expression of IFN-γ (IFN-γ negative) but secrete other T-cell functions in response to viral antigens have not been well studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%