1985
DOI: 10.2307/2098540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
91
1
14

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
91
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Scherer and Ross (1990:144) reach the conclusion that recent studies find only a "weak" correlation between growth rates and size. Studies finding mild departures of growth rates' independence from firm size include Kumar (1985), Hall (1987) and Evans (1987). Acs and Audretsch (1990: 145) state that, when they incorporate the impact of firm exits, they find that the greater propensity of small firms to exit the industry offsets the higher growth rate of surviving firms, and this could reconcile their results with Evans (1987) and Hall (1987).…”
Section: Dynamics Of Firm Growth and Liquidity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scherer and Ross (1990:144) reach the conclusion that recent studies find only a "weak" correlation between growth rates and size. Studies finding mild departures of growth rates' independence from firm size include Kumar (1985), Hall (1987) and Evans (1987). Acs and Audretsch (1990: 145) state that, when they incorporate the impact of firm exits, they find that the greater propensity of small firms to exit the industry offsets the higher growth rate of surviving firms, and this could reconcile their results with Evans (1987) and Hall (1987).…”
Section: Dynamics Of Firm Growth and Liquidity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If LPE holds firms growth rate should be uncorrelated with factors such as size and age. However, many studies find a negative correlation between firms growth and size (Mansfield, 1962, Evans, 1987, Kumar, 1985, Dunne and Hughes, 1994, McPherson, 1996, Das, 1995, and between firms growth and age (Evans, 1987, Dunne andHughes, 1994). Models of learning provide an explanation for the negative correlation between firm growth, and age and size (Lucas, 1978, Jovanovic, 1982, Pakes and Ericson, 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The estimation strategy consists of having, as far as possible, a complete set of controls to examine whether a robust association between wages and the probability of firm closing (and vice-versa) can be identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been largely shown in the empirical literature on firm survival that firm size and firm age are negatively associated with failure rates [see, for example, Kumar (1985), Evans (1987) use the same criteria to measure age in the 1993-95 period, we used as a proxy for firm age the tenure (in years) of the worker with the longest tenure within the firm. 15 A linear spline function is used to define the effect of the age of the firm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%