1987
DOI: 10.2527/jas1987.6451434x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Carcass Traits of Heifers as Affected by Hormonal Treatment

Abstract: Seventy-seven tleifers weighing about 200 kg were assigned randomly to 1) intact control (C), 2) ovariectomized (OVX), 3) immunized against estradiol (BSA-E), 4) BSA-E + trenbolone acetate (BSA-E+TBA), 5) TBA or 6) ovx + TBA groups. The objective of the study was to determine the effects of ovariectomy, immunoneutralization of estradiol and trenbolone acetate treatment on growth rate and carcass merit. Heifers were fed a corn-corn silage diet and were slaughtered when treatment groups attained live-animal weig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apple et al 1991). There was no effect of HGP implantation on ossification score in heifers, which was consistent with the results of Crouse et al (1987). Implantation of steers or heifers with Revalor-S or Revalor-H did not significantly decrease marbling score, or intramuscular fat percentage in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Hgp Implantation On Liveweight and Carcass Measuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Apple et al 1991). There was no effect of HGP implantation on ossification score in heifers, which was consistent with the results of Crouse et al (1987). Implantation of steers or heifers with Revalor-S or Revalor-H did not significantly decrease marbling score, or intramuscular fat percentage in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Hgp Implantation On Liveweight and Carcass Measuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reimplantation of yearling heifers utilizing a combination implant has resulted in heavier carcass weight and increased ribeye area when compared with nonimplanted controls (Mader et al, 1994). The use of two androgen implants was also found to increase ribeye area when compared to nonimplanted heifers (Crouse et al, 1987). However, Lehman et al (1996) observed similar final carcass weight and final yield grade between three reimplant strategies (Revalor-H/ Revalor-H, Synovex-H + Finaplix-H/Revalor-H, Synovex-H + Finaplix-H/Finaplix-H).…”
Section: Implant Strategies For Yearling Heifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 were implanted once at arrival with a moderate combination implant. Implants have been shown to decrease the QG of cattle (Crouse et al, 1987;Simms et al, 1988) when comparisons are made with similar days on feed and not at the same empty body fat or composition. When implant programs were compared at equal empty body fat, carcass quality appeared to be unaffected (Guiroy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%