1998
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-28-7-1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

19
87
5
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
19
87
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,3,5,27]). Fagus responded to changes in light environment by adjusting its leaf morphology, especially having higher SLA under shade (e.g.…”
Section: Allocation Versus Morphological Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1,3,5,27]). Fagus responded to changes in light environment by adjusting its leaf morphology, especially having higher SLA under shade (e.g.…”
Section: Allocation Versus Morphological Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fagus responded to changes in light environment by adjusting its leaf morphology, especially having higher SLA under shade (e.g. [5,29,37]). Spatial distribution of leaves within the crown also participate to reduce self-shading [39].…”
Section: Allocation Versus Morphological Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sugar maple is tolerant of shade conditions of the forest environment (Forcier 1975;Bellefleur and Villeneuve 1984;Beaudet and Messier 1998). The species responds readily to local disturbances induced by windthrows and windsnaps (Canham 1985;Payette et al 1990), and also to larger disturbances caused by clearcut (Albert and Barnes 1987;Bannon et al 2015;Pilon et al 2018), ice storm (Beaudet et al 2007) and fire (Pilon and Payette 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For practical reasons (e.g., greenhouse or transplant experiments, or because there were too few root suckers at a site), only beech of seed origin was included in some studies (Loach, 1970;Latham, 1992;Reid and Strain, 1994;Kobe et al, 2002;Caspersen and Saprunoff, 2005). In other studies, the origin of beech individuals was not specified (Amthor et al, 1990;Beaudet and Messier, 1998;Gill et al, 1998;Wilder et al, 1999;Beaudet et al, 2000;Finzi and Canham, 2000;McClure et al, 2000;Messier and Nikinmaa, 2000;Lin et al, 2001;Ricard et al, 2003). Nevertheless, differences between seedlings and root suckers were reported in a few studies that have addressed the question of beech origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%