2016
DOI: 10.1177/0019466216652753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Structure of Workforce in India

Abstract: Census 2011 brings new dimension to ongoing debate on the decline in the growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the different reasons identified in the existing literature, the factor intensity condition and work preference of women might also explain the falling FLFP in India. According to Census data, in 2011, 49.8 per cent of males and 65.1 per cent of females were engaged in agriculture (as cultivators and agricultural labourers) while 50.1 per cent of males and 34.9 per cent of females were employed in non-farm sector and household industry (Motkuri and Naik, 2016), indicating that agriculture is more female labour intensive in India. Second, there are evidences to confirm the conservative attitude in the Indian society regarding women's outside work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the different reasons identified in the existing literature, the factor intensity condition and work preference of women might also explain the falling FLFP in India. According to Census data, in 2011, 49.8 per cent of males and 65.1 per cent of females were engaged in agriculture (as cultivators and agricultural labourers) while 50.1 per cent of males and 34.9 per cent of females were employed in non-farm sector and household industry (Motkuri and Naik, 2016), indicating that agriculture is more female labour intensive in India. Second, there are evidences to confirm the conservative attitude in the Indian society regarding women's outside work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many research achievements in economic structure and economic growth ( [23][24][25][26][27][28], creating employment opportunities, promoting economic growth and industrial evolution are important reading materials for policymakers and relevant researcher (Audretsch, D. and Thurik, R., 1999) [29]. Population structure is an important part of economic growth (Motkuri, V. and Veslawatha, S. N., 2013; Soni, S. and Subrahmanya, M., 2020) [30,31]. If the population structure is differentiated by age, the population structure can affect economic growth through various channels (Wongboonsin, K., and Phiromswad, P., 2017) [32].…”
Section: Structural Deviation and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there is a clear trend of a negative working effect getting more prominent in the earlier age groups, which is supported by an increasing prevalence of higher education and government intervention. In the context of increasing demand for education, a considerable proportion of the younger population is either withdrawing from the workforce or postponing their entry into the workforce to attend educational institutions and pursue higher studies (Motkuri & Naik, 2016). The positive contribution of working effect at higher ages (age above 55), especially for females, is encouraging from a population with increasing longevity.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Change In Working Life Years Decomposition ...mentioning
confidence: 99%