1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-60.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and water‐use efficiency of 10 Triticum aestivum cultivars at different water availability in relation to allocation of biomass

Abstract: In environments where the amount of water is limiting growth, water-use efficiency (biomass production per unit water use) is an important trait. We studied the relationships of plant growth and water use efficiency with the pattern of hiomass allocation, using 10 wheat cultivars, grown at two soil moisture levels in a growth chamber. Allocation pattern and relative growth rate were not correlated, whereas allocation pattern and water use efficiency were. Variation in transpiration per plant resulted from vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
42
4
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
42
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Poorter and Nagel (2000), after reviewing the limited published data, attributed the decrease in RGR due to water stress to a decrease in NAR, and, to a lesser extent, to a decrease in SLA. However, Van den Boogaard et al (1997) did not find significant differences in the contribution of LAR and NAR to variation in RGR between well-watered and water-stressed wheat cultivars. Similarly, Ball and Pidsley (1995) and Ball (2002) showed in two mangrove species that RGR decline with increase in salinity was due to decrease in both NAR and LAR.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poorter and Nagel (2000), after reviewing the limited published data, attributed the decrease in RGR due to water stress to a decrease in NAR, and, to a lesser extent, to a decrease in SLA. However, Van den Boogaard et al (1997) did not find significant differences in the contribution of LAR and NAR to variation in RGR between well-watered and water-stressed wheat cultivars. Similarly, Ball and Pidsley (1995) and Ball (2002) showed in two mangrove species that RGR decline with increase in salinity was due to decrease in both NAR and LAR.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Despite its importance, the number of analyses of the effects of water stress on RGR is surprisingly scarce, and limited to very few species, notably grasses (Bargali and Tewari 2004;Kalapos et al 1996;Retuerto and Woodward 1993;Van den Boogaard et al 1995, 1997Van Splunder et al 1996;Wang et al 1998). Traits such as greater allocation of biomass below than above ground, a lower evaporative surface, and a higher leaf mass per unit leaf area are common water-stress effects on biomass allocation (Ludlow 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Martin et al (1994), leaf photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency are controlled by stomatal properties and by the anatomical characteristics of the leaves. Since WUE expresses the production of biomass per unit of water, leaf characteristics can be important when plants grow in waterlimited environments (Van Den Boogaard et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traits that increase WUE may conflict with those associated with both high RGR and productivity (Jones, 1993). By contrast, some reports have suggested that there is a potential for improving WUE without necessarily reducing both RGR (Van den Boogaard et al, 1997) and overall productivity (Monclus et al, 2006). Therefore, the identification of cultivars combining satisfactory growth and production and high WUE would be of great relevance for drought-prone areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet, traits that favour a high growth potential (i.e., high relative growth rate, RGR) under well-watered conditions also tend to decrease tolerance to low water availability, reflecting a trade-off between growth potential and drought tolerance (Bazzaz, 1994;Huston, 1994). The causes of variation in RGR due to drought is a contentious matter (Galmés et al, 2005), and have been attributed to changes in both physiological (i.e., net assimilation rate, NAR) and morphological (i.e., leaf area ratio, LAR) RGR's components (e.g., Van den Boogaard et al, 1997), or chiefly to changes in NAR (e.g., Poorter and Nagel, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%