Growth and yield of cotton in response to waterlogging

Bange, Michael; Milroy, S.P.; Thongbai, Pongmanee

doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.12.002

Cited by 121 publications

(120 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

111

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our data have affirmed the hypothesis that waterlogging-induced changes were different across canopy layers. Significantly higher inhibition of growth and yield under WL early compared with WL late suggested the sensitivity of cotton to soil waterlogging at early reproductive phase, confirming the earlier data of Bange et al (2004). Yield reduction from WL cotton was the result of fewer bolls produced at the upper and lower parts of the canopy.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…As the developing fruits in cotton rely heavily on subtending leaves for carbohydrate supply (Constable and Rawson, 1980), waterlogging-induced changes in nutrient status of leaves throughout the canopy may differentially influence growth and lint yield. Investigations into the physiology of waterlogging damage to cotton growth have been obtained by measuring changes in leaf N concentrations from the youngest fully expanded leaves of top of the canopy (Ashraf et al, 2011, Milroy et al, 2009 or assessing changes in growth of the whole plant (crop yield) (Bange et al, 2004). However, to meet the demand of actively developing bolls, the plants may remobilise N from older leaves to the upper canopy and maintain photosynthesis, affecting interpretation of the impacts of waterlogging.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Ullah¹,

Tan

Bange³

2016

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to an indeterminate growth habit, we hypothesised that different canopy layers of cotton might be variably influenced by soil waterlogging. The field-grown cotton cultivar (Sicot 71BRF) was waterlogged at early (WL early , 77 days after planting [DAP]) and late reproductive phases (WL late , 101 DAP) for 120 h. Data from different canopy layers e.g. bottom eight (MSN 1-8 ), middle five (MSN 9-13 ), and upper five main stem nodes (MSN 14+ ) were collected 1 d (post-WL) and 7 d after termination of waterlogging (postrecovery). Both waterlogging events significantly reduced post-WL dry biomass, leaf N concentration and fruit development on MSN 1-8 . In addition, WL early significantly reduced photosynthesis and increased total soluble sugars (TSS) in the MSN 1-8 and MSN 14+ leaves, although MSN 14+ leaves restored photosynthesis, N levels and TSS at recovery. It suggested that WL plants maintained photosynthesis of the upper leaves possibly by transporting N from the lower canopy leaves. Reduction (22%) in seed cotton yield under WL early was the result of fruit loss from first position fruits of the upper and lower sympodial fruiting branches (FB 1-5 and FB 11+ ). Despite restoring the growth through improved photosynthesis and N supply, no yield recovery on FB 11+ suggested that the plants used these assimilates for growth of the established fruits. No significant yield reduction in response to WL late suggested that the established cotton bolls were less sensitive to abscission across all canopy layers.Keywords: Canopy layers, lint yield, growth phase, leaf development, nitrogen re-mobilisation, photosynthesis. Abbreviation: DAP_days after planting; DW_dry weight; FR_fruit retention; FB 1-5 _lower 5 fruiting nodes; FB 5-10 _middle 5 fruiting nodes; FB 11-15 _top 5 fruiting nodes; GB_green bolls; LAI_leaf area index; MS N1-8 _lower 1-8 main stem nodes; MS N9-13 _middle 9-13 main stem nodes; MS N14-18 _top 14-18 main stem nodes; NWL_non-waterlogged; P n _photosynthesis; post-recovery_7 days after termination of waterlogging; post-WL_ day after termination of waterlogging; pre-WL_pre-waterlogging; SLA_specific leaf area; SLN_specific leaf nitrogen; TSS_total soluble sugars; WL early _waterlogging at early reproductive phase; WL late _waterlogging at late reproductive phase; WL_waterlogged.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Ullah¹,

Tan

Bange³

2016

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both flooding and waterlogging can seriously reduce yield (Dennis et al, 2000) and they are among the stresses considered by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the International Institute for Applied Statistical Research in their estimates of global arable land area and global productivity (Fischer et al, 2001). Flooding can result in yield reduction of up to 10% (Bange et al, 2004) and 40% in severe cases (Hodgson and Chan, 1982). As a consequence of disturbed physiological functioning, vegetative and reproductive growth of plants is negatively affected by flooding (Kozlowski, 1984;Gibbs and Greenway, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flooding tolerance of tomato genotypes during vegetative and reproductive stages

Ezin

Pena

Ahanchédé

2010

Braz. J. Plant Physiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of flooding on two tomato cultivars and two wild related species. Forty days old tomato plants were subjected to a continuous flooding stress of different durations: 0, 2, 4 and 8 days. Plant pots were placed inside larger plastic pots; they were irrigated with excessive quantity of tap water at 25 0 C so that the level of water above the surface of soil was 15 cm throughout the flooding period. At the bottom of each plastic pot a drilled hole allowed complete drainage of the pot after flooding. Parameters studied include plant height, number of leaves, leaf length, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll content, wilting, leaf senescence, adventitious root formation, number of flowers and fruits from cluster 2 to 6, average weight per fruit, fruit length and width, total fruit weight from cluster 2 to 6, total yield per plant. LA1579 genotype was more subjected to the deleterious effect of flooding on almost all the parameters studied. Therefore LA1579 genotype is flooding sensitive. Genotypes CLN2498E, and CA4 showed high tolerance to flooding while LA1421 genotype was tolerant to some extent. This experiment provides information that could help in the identification of physiological and agronomical parameters associated with flood-tolerance in vegetables.

show abstract

“…La sobresaturación del suelo implica el rápido desarrollo de anoxia o hipoxia en la planta, afectando la absorción de agua y nutrientes (Boru et al, 2003;Araki, 2006) y diferentes procesos fisiológicos como la fotosíntesis, respiración y senescencia de la hoja (Liao y Lin, 2001;Bange et al, 2004). Chapman y De la Vega (2002) reportan que con excesivas precipitaciones durante el llenado del grano, se disminuyen los rendimientos del cultivo de girasol.…”

Section: Estrés Hídrico Por Inundaciónunclassified

Fluorescencia como indicador de estrés en <i>Helianthus annuus</i> L. Una revisión

Jiménez-Suancha

Álvarado

Balaguera-López

2015

Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plantulas de tomate.Foto: Álvarez-Herrera. RESUMENEl girasol es una Asteraceae con alto potencial como planta de corte. Esta planta está expuesta a una amplia fluctuación de condiciones ambientales como luz, temperatura, suministro de agua y nutrientes. Estas condiciones pueden generar estrés sobre las plantas. El girasol presenta resistencia a la sequía, bajas y altas temperaturas. Los efectos del estrés dependen de la intensidad y de la etapa fenológica en que se presente. La fluorescencia puede ser empleada como herramienta para obtener información acerca de la influencia del estrés sobre el estado fisiológico del aparato fotosintético de las plantas y su respuesta será indicadora del daño o alteración en él. El objetivo de la presente revisión es exponer resultados de investigaciones científicas sobre los diferentes tipos de estrés evaluados en Helianthus annuus y la forma como ha sido empleada la fluorescencia como un indicador de dicho estrés. Contribuyendo así a ampliar la información disponible sobre esta importante especie.

show abstract

Growth and yield of cotton in response to waterlogging

Cited by 121 publications

References 30 publications

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Flooding tolerance of tomato genotypes during vegetative and reproductive stages

Fluorescencia como indicador de estrés en <i>Helianthus annuus</i> L. Una revisión

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About