1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02362245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth attributes of potato and their inter-relationship with yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characters often highlighted in this regard were number of tubers, tuber weight, plant height, and number of big sized tubers (Maity and Chattarzee 1977, Gunel et al 1991, Birhman and Kang 1993, Yildirim et al 1997, Bhagowati and Saikia 2003, Tuncturk and ÇiftÇi 2005. The sequential path model not only indicated that other characters, namely, number of main and secondary stems per plant, diameter of main stems, and tuber dry matter concentration, exercise their influence as second-order variables but also provided a better understanding of their relative contributions to the first-order variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characters often highlighted in this regard were number of tubers, tuber weight, plant height, and number of big sized tubers (Maity and Chattarzee 1977, Gunel et al 1991, Birhman and Kang 1993, Yildirim et al 1997, Bhagowati and Saikia 2003, Tuncturk and ÇiftÇi 2005. The sequential path model not only indicated that other characters, namely, number of main and secondary stems per plant, diameter of main stems, and tuber dry matter concentration, exercise their influence as second-order variables but also provided a better understanding of their relative contributions to the first-order variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Path coefficient analysis shows the extent of direct and indirect effects of the causal components on the response component. In most studies involving path analysis, researchers considered the predictor characters as first-order variables to analyse their effects over a dependent or response variable such as yield (Maity and Chattarzee 1977, Gunel et al 1991, Gopal et al 1994, Yildirim et al 1997, Bhagowati and Saikia 2003, Tuncturk and ÇiftÇi 2005. This approach might result in multicollinearity for variables, particularly when correlations among some of the characters are high (Samonte et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of storage roots at Niksar was higher than Kazova during both years. Yield, number and weight of storage roots per plant have been used to explain sweet potato yield by Maity and Chatterjee [ 42 ], Islam et al [ 19 ] and Afuape et al [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results Rxy = SPxy ssx.ssy from correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between average tuber weight, number of tubers per stand, tuber size and number of marketable tubers to total tuber yield. Maity and Chatterjee (1997) also reported number of tubers per plant are closely connected with the yield of potato tubers. Similar observation was reported for strong positive correlation of number of roots per plant and root weight to root yield of sweet potato (Yahaya et al, 2015).…”
Section: Simple Correlation Between Yield Components and Tuber Yieldmentioning
confidence: 86%