2015
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2015243-07480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth-climate relationships at yew and wild service trees on the eastern edge of their range in Europe

Abstract: <p><em>Aim of study</em>: The aim of the study was the construction of regional chronologies for South-Western Poland for yew (<em>Taxus baccata</em> L.) and wild service tree (<em>Sorbus torminalis</em> L.), two of the rarest native tree species on the edge of their range in Europe. The relationships growth-climate and incremental dynamics at both these species were investigated as well.</p><p><em>Area of study:</em> The eastern borders of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is still a lack of studies on the growth performance and drought sensitivity of minor Central European broadleaf tree species such Acer, Tilia, Carpinus and Sorbus species (Pyttel et al 2013, Gillner et al 2014. However, our results are in accordance with further dendroecological (Cedro & Cedro 2015, Klemmt et al 2015, Zimmermann et al 2015, Cedro 2016, as well as physiological studies (Tissier et al 2004, Nardini et al 2012, Kunz et al 2016 assessing the drought tolerance of minor tree species. Figure 2 shows that many of the more drought-tolerant species already play a dominant role in the broadleaf stands of the Franconian Plateau according to the NFI, especially Q. petraea and C. betulus.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Different Drought Tolerance Rankingssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is still a lack of studies on the growth performance and drought sensitivity of minor Central European broadleaf tree species such Acer, Tilia, Carpinus and Sorbus species (Pyttel et al 2013, Gillner et al 2014. However, our results are in accordance with further dendroecological (Cedro & Cedro 2015, Klemmt et al 2015, Zimmermann et al 2015, Cedro 2016, as well as physiological studies (Tissier et al 2004, Nardini et al 2012, Kunz et al 2016 assessing the drought tolerance of minor tree species. Figure 2 shows that many of the more drought-tolerant species already play a dominant role in the broadleaf stands of the Franconian Plateau according to the NFI, especially Q. petraea and C. betulus.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Different Drought Tolerance Rankingssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These analyses of climate-growth relationships based on tree rings allows a long-term evaluation of tree growth under various climatic conditions (Fritts 1976, Cook 1987, Cook & Peters 1997 and hence a relative ranking of species according to drought tolerance (Friedrichs et al 2009, Zang et al, 2011, Michelot et al 2012, Cavin et al 2013. As there are only few dendroecological studies addressing less common tree species (Gillner et al 2014, Zimmermann et al 2015, Cedro & Cedro 2015, Klemmt et al 2015, Cedro, 2016, a multiple methods approach seems to be promising to assess the future suitability for those species (Piedallu et al 2013, Fensham et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the lifespan of S. torminalis is 200-300 years (Crave, 1985;Favre-d'Anne, 1990;Pokorny, 1990), the species is rarely used in dendrochronological studies due to difficulty in identifying annual ring boundaries particularly in sapwood and frequent formation of false rings (Cedro & Cedro, 2015;Cedro, 2016;Rasmussen, 2007). In forests, S. torminalis usually grows at the midstory (Shpak et al, 2017,), which decreases trees climatic signal in chronological series (Cook & Kairiukstis, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth of approaches available for modelling tree ring growth (see the introduction for a summary) has been largely overlooked by the global land-surface community and until now, benchmarking land-surface models against ring-width records still relies mostly on interannual variation in the simulated net primary productivity as a proxy for TRW (Klesse et al, 2018;Kolus et al, 2019;Rammig et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2018). Although such an approach is valid to benchmark the capability of land-surface models to simulate interannual variability, the observations will need to be detrended to remove the size-related growth signal, adding considerable uncertainty to the benchmark (Bunde et al, 2013;Cedro, 2016;Nicklen et al, 2019;Stine, 2019). Moving beyond the net primary production proxy by explicitly simulating TRW enriches the benchmark since potentially confounding factors including climate responses, forest structure, age and size trends (Alexander et al, 2018;Nickless et al, 2011), as well as sampling biases (Babst et al, 2014a), can be better accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%