2009
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.200881180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films using ionization Ga source and application for solar cells

Abstract: Cu(In,Ga)Se2(CIGS) thin films with lower (Ga/III = 0.30) and higher (Ga/III = 0.70) Ga‐content were grown onto the soda‐lime glass substrates by the co‐evaporation process using ionization Ga source. The enlargement of grain size for the as‐grown CIGS films was observed using the higher grid ionization voltage (Vc) and filament current (Ifila). XRD results revealed that the crystal quality can be improved using higher Vc and Ifila which is consistent with SEM results. Hall effect measurements showed that an ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of energy band gap and electron affinity are varied due to the change in Ga/(In+Ga) ratios. The Table 3 shows the variation in band gap along with electron affinity of Cu(In 1−x Ga x )Se 2 layer with respect to the variation in “x” (Song et al 2004 ; Klein et al 1996 ; Dejene 2009 ; Johnson 2004 ; Li et al 2009 ; Minemoto et al 2001 ; Gloeckler and Sites 2005 ; Černivec et al 2007 ) which can successively be plotted through curve fitting as shown in Fig. 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of energy band gap and electron affinity are varied due to the change in Ga/(In+Ga) ratios. The Table 3 shows the variation in band gap along with electron affinity of Cu(In 1−x Ga x )Se 2 layer with respect to the variation in “x” (Song et al 2004 ; Klein et al 1996 ; Dejene 2009 ; Johnson 2004 ; Li et al 2009 ; Minemoto et al 2001 ; Gloeckler and Sites 2005 ; Černivec et al 2007 ) which can successively be plotted through curve fitting as shown in Fig. 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%