1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(87)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of double doped semi-insulating indium phosphide single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding energy of Ti represents its energy level below the conduction band. The energy 0.51 eV of Ti in SI InP co-doped with Ti and Zn determined from our measurements is a little smaller than the published value 0.53 eV [6]. However, there is rather large spread of values reported by different authors, from 0.62 eV [3] to the value 0.50 eV [7] determined from photoconductivity measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The binding energy of Ti represents its energy level below the conduction band. The energy 0.51 eV of Ti in SI InP co-doped with Ti and Zn determined from our measurements is a little smaller than the published value 0.53 eV [6]. However, there is rather large spread of values reported by different authors, from 0.62 eV [3] to the value 0.50 eV [7] determined from photoconductivity measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…3 is similar as that of Fe (0.65 eV) [4] but its hole capture cross section is substantially smaller than that of Fe [5]. The activation energy of Ti measured on different samples prepared in different laboratories is rather different [3,[6][7][8], probably because conditions of preparing crystals were slightly different. Titanium acts as a deep donor in InP, therefore SI InP can be prepared only by codoping with Ti and a suitable acceptor in sufficient concentration for full compensation of residual donor impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, co-doping positively affected the crystal growth of GaAs single crystals [83]. Moreover, effects of co-doping were established for InP [84][85][86][87][88], and this method was applied for fabricating related devices [89]. In the 1990s, studies on contamination-related effects of defect complexes and diffusion, such as the studies of Fe, copper (Cu), or hydrogen (H) in Si [90][91][92][93][94] or wide band-gap materials [95,96], had attracted significant attention.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is co-doping with TM donors and shallow acceptors. SI crystals of Cr-doped InP co-doped with Cd and Hg with resistivities up to 10 6 Ωcm were grown [8], however the thermal stability of Cr in InP is similar to that of Fe. SI crystals of Ti-doped InP co-doped with Hg [8], Be, Cd, Zn [9], and Mn [10] with resistivities about 10 6 Ωcm and very high thermal stability were presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%