The prognostic significance of blood pressure (BP) variability has lately enjoyed considerable attention. The need for early markers of cardiovascular dysfunction is imperative in black South Africans who have a significant risk for cardiovascular disease. We therefore compared 24-h BP variability with various traditional and advanced BP measurements, regarding their association with sub-clinical organ damage in black and white South Africans. The study included 409 African and Caucasian teachers aged 25-60 yrs. We measured office BP, 1-min continuous (finger) BP, ambulatory BP, BP reactivity and determined weighted 24-h BP variability. Albumin-to-creatinine ratio, Cornell product and carotid cross-sectional wall area (CSWA) were measures of organ damage. Africans had higher 24-h BP, BP variability, BP reactivity and sub-clinical organ damage (Po0.001). Correlations of BP variability with organ damage were overall weak when compared with other BP measurements. In normotensive groups, we found an independent association of 24-h systolic BP (SBP) variability with Cornell product only in Africans (r¼0.37; P¼0.01), confirmed in multiple regression models, with 24-h SBP included in the model. Only in hypertensive Caucasians, a significant correlation between CSWA and 24-h SBP variability was evident (r¼0.30; P¼0.01), although CSWA indicated stronger correlations with office or 24-h SBP than 24-h SBP variability. To conclude, 24-h SBP variability could potentially be an effective measure for the early detection of normotensive Africans at increased risk for the development of cardiovascular complications. Its usefulness based on associations with target organ damage in hypertensive groups seems to be less than traditional office or 24-h BP measurements. Hypertension Research (2011Research ( ) 34, 1127Research ( -1134 doi:10.1038/hr.2011; published online 28 July 2011Keywords: albumin-to-creatinine ratio; ethnicity; intima-media thickness; left ventricular hypertrophy
INTRODUCTIONThe prognostic significance of blood pressure (BP) variability has lately enjoyed considerable attention in the literature. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Where some papers emphasize the importance of BP variability in prediction of risk of vascular events, 1,2,6,9 others question its prediction of cardiovascular outcome. 4,5,10 Despite this upsurge of recent papers, consistent evidence over the past three decades lends support that both target organ damage and the rate of cardiovascular events of hypertensive patients are significantly and independently related to the degree of BP variability. [11][12][13][14][15] A limitation of many of these papers is that either BP variability alone was investigated, or various measures of BP variability (such as s.d. of 24-h BP, average real variability index 16 and weighted 24-h BP s.d. 17 ) were being compared, regarding the strength of their association with target organ damage.The question therefore arises how BP variability would benchmark against a comprehensive range of both traditional and advanced