2007
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth plate formation and development in alligator and mouse metapodials: evolutionary and functional implications

Abstract: Mammalian metapodials (metacarpals and metatarsals), unlike most long bones, form a single growth plate, and undergo longitudinal growth at only one end. The growth dynamics of non-mammalian tetrapod metapodials have not been systematically examined in order to determine if unidirectional growth is unique to mammals. Here we compare murine metapodial ossification in growth stages that parallel those of embryonic, juvenile and subadult American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis). Safranin O staining was us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the ancient and embryonic iterations of the chondroepiphyseal growth zones, there exists a lesser-known iteration that occupies one end of the short bones of the hands and feet (8,9,20). Whether these short-bone chondroepiphyses represent a persistence of the primitive structure or evolved secondarily is unclear, but they phenocopy the ancient chondroepiphysis in every detail and might therefore serve as a model system of what a primitive joint structure might have been like.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the ancient and embryonic iterations of the chondroepiphyseal growth zones, there exists a lesser-known iteration that occupies one end of the short bones of the hands and feet (8,9,20). Whether these short-bone chondroepiphyses represent a persistence of the primitive structure or evolved secondarily is unclear, but they phenocopy the ancient chondroepiphysis in every detail and might therefore serve as a model system of what a primitive joint structure might have been like.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exactly where the first metacarpal falls with respect to these Hox expression domains is presently unclear. Although it is certainly possible that it lies within either the same domain as the remainder of digit one or that of the four posterior digits, it is equally possible that this morphologically distinct metacarpal, whose growth plate is unique in being proximal rather than distal in mammals (Reno et al, 2007), expresses a unique combination of Hox genes altogether. The Hox expression patterns described above suggest the existence of several potential distal forelimb growth modules (Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As noted above, the mammalian MC1 has a unique structure. Unlike its posterior counterparts, its physis is proximal in mammals rather than distal (Reno et al, 2007), and therefore lies in the immediate proximity of the carpus. The first ray always exhibits a maximum of two phalanges, but very often in those cases in which it suffers distinct involution (e.g., Ateles, Colobus and hallux of Pongo), the effects of such reduction are far more dramatic in its phalanges than its metacarpal-which can sometimes remain large and robust (even though subcutaneous) within the palm, despite the loss of its phalanges.…”
Section: Identification Of Growth Modules In the Anthropoid Distal Fomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is especially the case for eutherian tarsometatarsal joints, which appear to have sacrificed their proximal metapodial growth plate to encourage a more rigid syndesmosis (38). The markedly rugose tarsometatarsal joint capsule in the Ar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%