Abstract. A segmented morphism σn : ∆ * −→ {a, b} * , n ∈ N, maps each symbol in ∆ onto a word which consists of n distinct subwords in ab + a. In the present paper, we examine the impact of n on the unambiguity of σn with respect to any α ∈ ∆ + , i. e. the question of whether there does not exist a morphism τ satisfying τ (α) = σn(α) and, for some symbol x in α, τ (x) = σn(x). To this end, we consider the set U (σn) of those α ∈ ∆ + with respect to which σn is unambiguous, and we comprehensively describe its relation to any U (σm), m = n. Our paper thus contributes fundamental (and, in parts, fairly counter-intuitive) results to the recently initiated research on the ambiguity of morphisms.