1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.14341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth process and compressed phase of DMe-DCNQI on Ag(110) in the monolayer regime observed by LEED, XPS, and STM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our previous work, 27 the supramolecular structure of diFc-14 on Cu(110) at submonolayer coverage is an extended phase with its base vector b 1 2% longer than the compressed phase at monolayer coverage. The relatively larger spacing between two columns of stacked molecules makes the intercalated molecules free to some extent to take a more energetically favorable configuration with the environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar to our previous work, 27 the supramolecular structure of diFc-14 on Cu(110) at submonolayer coverage is an extended phase with its base vector b 1 2% longer than the compressed phase at monolayer coverage. The relatively larger spacing between two columns of stacked molecules makes the intercalated molecules free to some extent to take a more energetically favorable configuration with the environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…50 After depositing DCNQI a small new feature appears at ∼398.5 eV, which is similar to the N 1s binding energy measured after depositing DMe−DCNQI on Ag(110) 51 but lower than the one measured for a DMe-DCNQI multilayer on Ag(111), 52 possibly indicating a charge transfer from the substrate to the molecule. 51 Similar results, i.e., a shift to lower binding energy of the N 1s core level when compared to the bulk compound, have been reported for the closely related TCNQ molecule when deposited on copper or silver substrates. 16,53−55 After Fe deposition and annealing, the position of this peak does not change appreciably, indicating that the molecule remains approximately in the same charged state after coordination.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Figure shows the N 1s, Fe 2p, and C 1s core levels (a) of the clean Ag(111) surface, (b) of the surface after depositing a submonolayer amount of DCNQI, (c) of the surface after depositing Fe on this molecular layer, and (d) of the surface after annealing to 380 K. The two peaks appearing at ∼398.5 and 393.0 eV in the N 1s spectra of the clean Ag surface are due to bulk plasmon losses . After depositing DCNQI a small new feature appears at ∼398.5 eV, which is similar to the N 1s binding energy measured after depositing DMe–DCNQI on Ag(110) but lower than the one measured for a DMe-DCNQI multilayer on Ag(111), possibly indicating a charge transfer from the substrate to the molecule . Similar results, i.e., a shift to lower binding energy of the N 1s core level when compared to the bulk compound, have been reported for the closely related TCNQ molecule when deposited on copper or silver substrates. , After Fe deposition and annealing, the position of this peak does not change appreciably, indicating that the molecule remains approximately in the same charged state after coordination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,24 In this schematic of the structural relation, the adsorption sites of the pentacene molecules relative to the substrate Ag atoms are arbitrarily chosen. The favorable positions and orientations of the main axis of the pentacene molecules on the Ag͑110͒ substrate is to be further determined by the following theoretical calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%