Numerous indices have been used to estimate fish growth and condition; however, differences in sensitivity and reliability of the methods have hampered efforts to identify appropriate indicators for routine evaluation of habitat quality in the field. We compared common morphometric (length, weight, somatic growth, length-weight condition) and biochemical (RNA:DNA ratio, relative DNA content, energy density) growth indices on the same wild-caught mosquitofish Gambusia affinis to examine their usefulness as indicators of habitat quality. A laboratory experiment was used to quantify growth rates of wild-caught G. affinis under different feeding treatments. Field studies consisted of both a short-term enclosure experiment (10 d) and weekly (7 wk) fish collections to compare growth indices in managed inflow and reference marshes during a winter/spring freshwater pulse event in upper Breton Sound, Louisiana, USA. Marshes flooded by restored freshwater pulses were capable of producing optimum growth (0.001 g DW d -1; DW = dry weight) and energetically valuable habitat (> 6000 cal g -1 DW) for trophic transport. Because of differences in timing of response, morphometric and biochemical indices were generally not directly correlated, but there was clear agreement in direction and magnitude of response. The most striking difference in timing was that biochemical indices (RNA:DNA) responded more slowly to treatments than did morphometric growth indices. While gross patterns are comparable between indicators, differences in sensitivity and response time between indicators suggest that choice of indicator needs to be accounted for in interpretation and analysis of effects.KEY WORDS: Growth · Energy density · RNA:DNA ratio · Resident species · Poeciliidae · Estuary · Fish · Louisiana
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 412: [231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245] 2010 some methods have hampered efforts to identify appropriate indicators for routine evaluation of habitat quality in the field.Increasing threats to fish populations arising from both natural events and anthropogenic activities have led to extensive estuarine restoration activities around the world and a critical need for appropriate indicators to assess the relationship between restored and altered habitat and their associated fish populations (Madon 2008). In particular, restoration in large-river delta environments (e.g. Williamson River Delta, Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, Mississippi River Delta) often focuses on the reconnection of the riverine flood events that provide extended access to highquality, ephemerally flooded estuarine habitats for transient and resident fishes (Kneib 2000). These flooded habitats have been shown to be functionally valuable for fish growth due to an abundance of high quality food sources (Madon 2008). In coastal Louisiana, the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion (Caernarvon) is one such project that restores the annual s...