2013
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2013.833142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth responses and adaptations of the emergent macrophyteAcorus calamusLinn. to different water-level fluctuations

Abstract: Acorus calamus Linn. was grown under four water-level fluctuation (WLF) treatments to study the influence of WLF on the growth of the species. The four WLF treatments (designated as 0 cm, 60 cm, 60 AE 30 cm, and 60 AE 60 cm) were initiated with the minimum water levels (0, 60, 30, and 0 cm, respectively) for a week and then switched to the maximal water levels (0, 60, 90, and 120 cm, respectively) one week later. This cycle was repeated six times during 12 weeks. Relative growth rate (RGR), biomass allocation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the cyclic water level fluctuations may result in intermittent periods of resource limitation for H . verticillata and the degree of limitation should be commensurate with the amplitude of water level fluctuations [ 36 , 37 ]. Consequently, this species was adequate in static water and responded negatively to increasing fluctuating amplitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the cyclic water level fluctuations may result in intermittent periods of resource limitation for H . verticillata and the degree of limitation should be commensurate with the amplitude of water level fluctuations [ 36 , 37 ]. Consequently, this species was adequate in static water and responded negatively to increasing fluctuating amplitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uplands slow runoff, infiltrate water, and filter sediment. Little is known about the influence of shoreline conditions on the development and persistence of macrophyte communities (Feldman and Maemets 2004;Van Geest et al 2005;Feldmann and Noges 2007;Tağil 2007;Wei et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of laboratory studies have investigated the growth of wetland vegetation in response to water table depths and found the decline of a groundwater table can have a negative impact on plant growth (Amlin & Rood, 2002;Deegan et al, 2007;Imada et al, 2010;Wei et al, 2014). Laboratory experiments may be unsuitable for examining community structure response to groundwater depths; however, controlled conditions create the advantage of being able to test the response of plants to extreme groundwater levels.…”
Section: Interactions Between Wetland Vegetation and Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have investigated how wetland vegetation growth responds to controlled water level fluctuations, such as rate, frequency and depth of controlled flooding and drought conditions (Deegan et al, 2007;Smith & Brock, 2007;Wei et al, 2014). Deegan et al (2007) studied the impact of ±0cm, ±15cm, ±30cm and ±45cm…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation