1947
DOI: 10.1093/jn/33.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Studies with Rats Kept Under Conditions Which Prevent Coprophagy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a follow‐up to the nutritional study of coprophagy by Geyer et al. (1946), an examination of nutritional substances in growth tests under coprophagy‐prevented conditions was needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a follow‐up to the nutritional study of coprophagy by Geyer et al. (1946), an examination of nutritional substances in growth tests under coprophagy‐prevented conditions was needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At ages 28, 31, 35, and 38 days, animals were individually housed in metabolic cages for a 12-hour nocturnal period and the urine excreted in that time was measured and collected in Erlenmeyer bottles to minimize evaporation. Feces were not collected because of the coprophagy of rats [16] and because the prevention of coprophagy depresses the growth of the animals [17]. Food intake of animals was measured during metabolic cage housing.…”
Section: Animal Handling and Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-established methods known to prevent coprophagy are neck collars for rabbits (Kulwich, Struglia & Person, 1953) and tail (anal) cups (Barnes, Fiala & Kwong, 1963), jackets (Armstrong & Softly, 1966), neck collars (Neale, 1984) or specially designed cages (Geiyer et al, 1947) for rats. We have studied coprophagy in the mouse (Takahashi et al, 1985;Ebino et al, 1986 Ebino et al, , 1987, but were unsuccessful in the application of a neck collar or a tail cup.…”
Section: Abstract: Mice; Coprophagymentioning
confidence: 99%