2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29436-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRUNGE: A Grand Unified ATP Challenge

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 3 It is shown from ( 1), ( 2), ( 3), ( 4), (5) in Definition 17 that the equality predicate E in L n F(X) should satisfy properties of α-reflexity, α-symmetry, α-transitivity and α-monotonicity for function and predicate symbols, respectively.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 3 It is shown from ( 1), ( 2), ( 3), ( 4), (5) in Definition 17 that the equality predicate E in L n F(X) should satisfy properties of α-reflexity, α-symmetry, α-transitivity and α-monotonicity for function and predicate symbols, respectively.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, many restricted resolution methods [7] are proposed, for instance, lock resolution, hyper-resolution, semantic resolution, extension rule [19], etc. Different from restrictions on literals and clauses, contradiction separation based automated deduction [28] is an extension of binary resolution, where dynamic and multiple (two or more) clauses and literals involving in every deductive step, and its implementation CSE-E [6] also has a good performance among others [5,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets are using different mathematical formalisms which makes it difficult to compare systems based on different logics. A recent work GRUNGE [13] addresses this problem by translating HOL4 libraries to multiple TPTP formats and logics -(un)typed/polymorphic first/higher order -providing a large unified theorem proving and machine learning challenge.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, we aim to explore the achieved results in the context of program equivalence [12]. placed a bounty of 1 Proofgold 6 [3] bar on each of the corresponding formal propositions. As a consequence anyone can claim 1 Proofgold bar by giving an appropriate proof term for the corresponding problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%