1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1997.596038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSM enhanced full rate speech codec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the example of a cellular phone as the client, the common speech codec used is the GSM Enhanced Full-Rate (GSM-EFR) codec, which has a computational complexity of approximately 18 Mflops and a static memory requirement of 5900 words (16-bit) (Jarvinen et al, 1997). MFCC feature extraction requires at most 10 Mflops or less (Adami et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bitrate Scalability Computational Complexity and Memory Reqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the example of a cellular phone as the client, the common speech codec used is the GSM Enhanced Full-Rate (GSM-EFR) codec, which has a computational complexity of approximately 18 Mflops and a static memory requirement of 5900 words (16-bit) (Jarvinen et al, 1997). MFCC feature extraction requires at most 10 Mflops or less (Adami et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bitrate Scalability Computational Complexity and Memory Reqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AMR speech codec utilises the Algebraic Code Excitation Linear Prediction (ACELP) algorithm that has also been employed in GSM EFR [9] and D-AMPS EFR [10]. This adaptive coder is also referred to as the Multi-Rate ACELP (MR-ACELP) [11] coder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many variations of CELP coders have been standardized including [1,19] G.723.1 operating at 6.3/5.3 kbit/s, G.729 operating at 8 kbit/s, G.728 a low delay coder operating at 16 kbit/s and all the digital mobile telephony encoding standards including [20,21,22,23] GSM, IS-54, IS-95 and IS-136. Figure 1.1 shows a simple block diagram of a CELP coder.…”
Section: Hybrid Codersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to make valid comparisons with existing coders as, to our knowledge, there is no other low rate coder accommodating both speech and music inputs. However, we have compared the quality of the coded signals using NPAC, the RealAudio 6 music coder operating at 8 kbit/s, the RealAudio speech coder operating at 8.5 kbit/s and the G.729 speech coder [20] operating at 8 kbit/s. The quality of the coded signals were evaluated through informal tests.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation