1999
DOI: 10.1029/1998ja900125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSWM‐98: Results for migrating solar tides

Abstract: Interferometer (HRDI) zonal mean zonal wind data. We quantify and interpret differences between previous diurnal and semidiurnal predictions, hereafter G SWM-95, and GSWM-98 results. The revised GW stress parameterization accounts for the most profound changes and leads to seasonal variability predictions that are consistent with diurnal amplitudes observed in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Unresolved differences between HRDI and other wind climatologies significantly affect MLT tidal predictions. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
353
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(379 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
24
353
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the GSWM and CRISTA comparisons reported herein, we were motivated to calculate a GSWM tidal climatology appropriate for November conditions. The GSWM-98 climatological diurnal tidal predictions for October are probably inadequate indicators of the solar migrating tide during November, because the migrating diurnal tide is strongly affected by the zonal mean zonal wind field [Hagan et al, 1999a] (Figure 7) below 90 km also compare qualitatively well to the derived geostrophic wind field. It is quite interesting that the SH tropical wind maximum in the mesosphere is present in both data sets (but less pronounced in GRAM-95).…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the GSWM and CRISTA comparisons reported herein, we were motivated to calculate a GSWM tidal climatology appropriate for November conditions. The GSWM-98 climatological diurnal tidal predictions for October are probably inadequate indicators of the solar migrating tide during November, because the migrating diurnal tide is strongly affected by the zonal mean zonal wind field [Hagan et al, 1999a] (Figure 7) below 90 km also compare qualitatively well to the derived geostrophic wind field. It is quite interesting that the SH tropical wind maximum in the mesosphere is present in both data sets (but less pronounced in GRAM-95).…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As pointed out by Hagan et al [1999a], the diurnal tidal response during equinox conditions is largely attributable to the zonal wind in the stratosphere. Figure 12 illustrates that the equatorial wind field differences between GSWM-98 and the base case calculations are rather small in this altitude regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Properties of the semidiurnal tides propagating up from the lower atmosphere are generally unknown for specific simulation intervals, and are specified at the lower boundary of the TIME-GCM (e.g. Fesen et al, 1986) using seasonal averages derived from the Global Scale Wave Model of Hagan et al (1999), although they can be tuned for specific dates if sufficient tidal data are available.…”
Section: Thermosphere-ionosphere-mesosphereelectrodynamics Genaral CImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the day-to-day variability is mainly because of the variability in the tidal structure, which also exhibits large seasonal variability [Deepa et al, 2006]. Tides have horizontal wind amplitudes that can exceed 50 m/s and temperature amplitudes of as much as 20 K at upper mesospheric altitudes [Hagan et al, 1999]. Tidal amplitudes increase with altitude up to the lower thermosphere and vary somewhat regularly with season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%