2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003gl017732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guadalupe Island, Mexico as a new constraint for Pacific plate motion

Abstract: We use GPS data collected on Isla de Guadalupe and in northern Baja California, Mexico, to estimate site velocities relative to Pacific plate motion. The velocities of all three geodetic monuments on Guadalupe fit a rigid Pacific plate model with residuals of 1 mm/yr. Using the Guadalupe data and data from five IGS stations on the Pacific plate (CHAT, KOKB, KWJ1, MKEA, and THTI) we estimate an angular velocity for this plate that is consistent with other recently‐published estimates. Our results indicate that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) North America–Pacific plate motion estimates at 36°N, 120.6°W from different subsets of the MORVEL plate circuits and data (specified in the legend). GPS‐based estimates are as follows: 1, DeMets & Dixon (1999); 2, Beavan et al (2002); 3, Sella et al (2002); 4, Gonzales‐Garcia et al (2003); 5, Marquez‐Azua et al (2004); 6, Plattner et al (2007); 7, Kogan & Steblov (2008) and 8, Argus et al (2010). Blue circle with ellipse is the GPS estimate from this study (Table 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…(b) North America–Pacific plate motion estimates at 36°N, 120.6°W from different subsets of the MORVEL plate circuits and data (specified in the legend). GPS‐based estimates are as follows: 1, DeMets & Dixon (1999); 2, Beavan et al (2002); 3, Sella et al (2002); 4, Gonzales‐Garcia et al (2003); 5, Marquez‐Azua et al (2004); 6, Plattner et al (2007); 7, Kogan & Steblov (2008) and 8, Argus et al (2010). Blue circle with ellipse is the GPS estimate from this study (Table 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Slip rate estimates for the westernmost model faults range from 3 to 5 mm/yr. These slip rate estimates are generally in agreement with those estimated in previous block model studies in this region [ Bennett et al ., ; Dixon et al ., ; Gonzalez‐Garcia et al ., ; Meade and Hager , ]. If we decompose the strike‐slip rate estimates into vectors that are parallel and perpendicular to the general direction of PA‐NA plate motion (316°) [ Argus et al ., ), then sum the plate‐motion parallel rates along profiles perpendicular to plate motion direction is in the range 47.5–50.7 mm/yr, consistent with previous plate motion calculations [ DeMets et al ., ; DeMets and Dixon , ; Sella et al ., ; Argus et al ., ; DeMets et al ., ].…”
Section: Analysis Of Crustal Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, evidence is accumulating that Baja California's motion is distinct from that of the Pacific Plate (Fig. 1) and thus behaves as a separate block or microplate (Dixon et al 2000b; Fletcher & Munguia 2000; Gonzalez‐Garcia et al 2003; Michaud et al 2004). Here we use new GPS data to quantify current North America–Pacific Plate motion and investigate coupling and rigidity of Baja California and the Pacific Plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the geodetic estimates of NA‐Pacific motion has improved with time, as more stations become available and GPS time‐series become longer (Argus & Heflin 1995; Larson et al 1997; DeMets & Dixon 1999; Freymueller et al 1999; Beavan et al 2002; Sella et al 2002; Gonzales‐Garcia et al 2003). Our result for NA‐PA1 together with previous results is listed in Table 2, and illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%