2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(00)00529-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance for robustness/ruggedness tests in method validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
280
0
28

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 541 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
280
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…The robustness of the method was evaluated to establish the capability of the method by changing the experimental conditions and studying its impact on the system suitability 22 . Robustness was performed by changing the method parameters like mobile phase flow rate and column temperature.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of the method was evaluated to establish the capability of the method by changing the experimental conditions and studying its impact on the system suitability 22 . Robustness was performed by changing the method parameters like mobile phase flow rate and column temperature.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage [26,27]. Robustness testing is nowadays well known and widely applied, especially in the pharmaceutical industries that must comply with strict regulations.…”
Section: Fig 1 Chemical Structures Of Hydrochlorothiazide and Valsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphical interpretation may be based on a halfnormal probability plot, while the statistical interpretation on the approach of Dong [27]. In this approach, an initial estimate of error on an effect, S 0 , is obtained with the following equation.…”
Section: Robustness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments to study the influence of these small changes are usually evaluated more 53 efficiently by means of experimental design approaches with the factors at two levels, mostly 54 by using screening designs, either a saturated fractional factorial or a Plackett-Burman design 55 [6,7,8,9,10]. 56 57…”
Section: /24 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, a standard design, such as a Plackett-Burman [6] estimates of the coefficients related to blocks and of the remaining coefficients should be 178 null, or at least, the closer to zero the better. This is so in order to guarantee that the 179 interpretation of the effects of the experimental factors is independent of the block effect.…”
Section: Construction Of the Experimental Design 127 128mentioning
confidence: 99%