Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section

Lynch, Christopher D.; Opdam, N.J.M.; Hickel, Reinhard; Brunton, Paul; Gürgan, Sevil; Kakaboura, Afrodite; Shearer, Ann; Vanherle, Guido; Wilson, Nairn

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.009

Cited by 194 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time amalgam has become less popular due to its "black" metallic appearance and biocompatibility concerns. The time required for the restoration of posterior cavities with composite materials may reach twice the time compared to restoring these cavities with amalgam [1]. Therefore most manufacturers developed new generations of adhesive systems in order to reduce the time (and steps) during bonding and so-called "bulk-fill" composites [2,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…O estudo se torna importante, pois RS apresentam o maior nível de evidência visto que estão localizadas no topo da pirâmide de evidência e as restaurações de resina compostas representam uma das atividades mais desenvolvidas nos consultórios odontológicos 1,2 . Foram localizadas, no total, 11 revisões sobre o tema com diferenças significativas na condução e no reporte.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Dessa forma, representa uma das atividades mais desenvolvidas nos consultórios odontológicos devido à rapidez do tratamento, ao baixo custo e excelente resultado estético 1,2 . A longevidade de restaurações está relacionada com o tempo que essa restauração permanece em boca de forma aceitável.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Características de reporte e condução de revisões sistemáticas que avaliaram a longevidade de restaurações de resina composta em dentes posteriores

Aquino

Dias

Almeida

et al. 2017

Rev. da Fac. de Odontologia, UPF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muitas revisões avaliando a longevidade de restaurações de resina composta em dentes posteriores vem IntroduçãoAs restaurações de resina composta são amplamente utilizadas em dentes posteriores com a finalidade de restabelecer forma e função a dentes acometidos por cárie, atrição, fraturas e outros fatores. Dessa forma, representa uma das atividades mais desenvolvidas nos consultórios odontológicos devido à rapidez do tratamento, ao baixo custo e excelente resultado estético 1,2 . A longevidade de restaurações está relacionada com o tempo que essa restauração permanece em boca de forma aceitável. Conhecer e avaliar a longevidade e os fatores envolvidos é importante, uma vez que a troca repetitiva de material desgasta o dente e pode acarretar perda de tecido dentário sa-

show abstract

“…In minimally invasive restorative dentistry, treatment indications were extended for direct resin composite restorations in the posterior region, and resin composite materials were recently reported to be the materials of choice (1). Long-term clinical observations showed that even large cavities encompassing three or more surfaces and cusps of load-bearing posterior teeth can be restored successfully with minimally invasive direct restoration techniques (2)(3)(4)(5).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological evaluation of subgingivally placed direct resin composite materials

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine release of resin monomers from RBCs after 1 h, 1 day, and 7 days. As compared with tissue culture plastics (the control), cellular adhesion was significantly lower (P < 0.001) for human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Only minor, nonsignificant differences between individual RBCs were identified. HPLC analyses identified the release of three bifunctional methacrylates bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, and diurethane dimethacrylate from RBCs and showed that monomer release increased between 1 h and 1 day but remained low. The present findings suggest that surface adhesion in the subgingival area is limited for the tested RBCs. Although residual monomer release was low for all tested RBCs, it might be sufficient to adversely affect cell adhesion.

show abstract

Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section

Cited by 194 publications

References 54 publications

Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Características de reporte e condução de revisões sistemáticas que avaliaram a longevidade de restaurações de resina composta em dentes posteriores

Biological evaluation of subgingivally placed direct resin composite materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About