2001
DOI: 10.1201/9781482270990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guide to Writing Empirical Papers, Theses, and Dissertations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A two-tailed Pearson chi-square test (Garson, 2001) was used to determine significant differences and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the incomplete beta function (Sauro, 2004). To minimize the possibility of chance significant findings, the p value of significant tests (p) was multiplied by the total number of variables analyzed (K) according to the Bonferroni method (Altman, 1997) so that adjusted P 0 ¼ P(K) (Altman, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-tailed Pearson chi-square test (Garson, 2001) was used to determine significant differences and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the incomplete beta function (Sauro, 2004). To minimize the possibility of chance significant findings, the p value of significant tests (p) was multiplied by the total number of variables analyzed (K) according to the Bonferroni method (Altman, 1997) so that adjusted P 0 ¼ P(K) (Altman, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discriminant validity is about whether one construct is indeed different from other constructs, and there is no overlap in the measuring indicators of one construct with another (Churchill, 1979;Garson, 2002). One way to assess discriminant validity is to examine the correlations of the different variables in Table 3.…”
Section: Validating the Measurement Model For Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its optimal scaling property converts categorical variables into numerical variables to find the best model fit. That is, CATREG maximizes goodness of fit by finding appropriate values for categorical variables (Garson, 2001). Also, to find the relative importance of explanatory variables, CATREG is preferred to other methods.…”
Section: Econometric Framework: Categorical Regression (Catreg)mentioning
confidence: 99%